Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bad\s+e\-mail\s+address\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bad\s+e\-mail\s+address\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Bad e-mail address (score: 1): Author: "Julio Peralta" <jperalta@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:13:12 -0500; Every time I send an e-mail to the TowerTalk reflector I get a message back from "Mail Delivery Subsystem" reporting that an e-mail address had permanent fatal errors. The address is geo888@cs.com. D; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00104.html (7,465 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Bad e-mail address (score: 1): Author: "Malcolm Ringel" <mringel@bluecrab.org>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:42:32 -0500; back from "Mail Delivery Subsystem" reporting that an e-mail address had permanent fatal errors. The address is geo888@cs.com. Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00108.html (8,616 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Bad e-mail address (score: 1): Author: Joe - WDØM <WD0M@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 08:45:25 -0700; Same here, and I suspect for the entire mailing list. It would be nice if that address could be "un-subscribed." I have my e-mail program (Eudora) set to automatically trash it. 73, Joe WDØM A; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00109.html (8,323 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Bad e-mail address (score: 1): Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 14:35:34 -0800; Quite a few of us have complained about that for some time. Don't know what the fix is or when it may be done....... Julio Peralta wrote: Every time I send an e-mail to the TowerTalk reflector I get; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00131.html (9,020 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Bad e-mail address (score: 1): Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:52:19 -0800; If the person subscribed from that address, it would be fairly for the list administrator to unsubscribe him. However, if it is via an alias, such as arrl.net, it is harder to track it down. Searchin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00135.html (10,629 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Bad e-mail address (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Gooden" <cgooden@insightbb.com>; Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 18:11:55 -0600; I'm confused...What difference does it make whether he subscribed from the address or an alias. The admistrator should still be able to delete him from the subscription list. IMHO, Bounced email shou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00138.html (8,265 bytes)
7. RE: [TowerTalk] Bad e-mail address (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 19:55:32 -0500; The MailMan software does not know about the alias and thus the administrator CAN NOT FIND the "bad" address. For example, if I used the alias K4IK@arrl.net and had it pointed to my_email@hotmail.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00139.html (8,949 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]