Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+weight\s+on\s+rotator\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+weight\s+on\s+rotator\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna weight on rotator (score: 1): Author: jackcolson@x-press.net (jack colson); Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 09:18:25 -0400; Hi all, I'd like to learn what is the better approach concerning antenna weight on the rotator. For ease of changing rotators and not having to raise the antenna stack it would be nice to have all th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00129.html (7,491 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Antenna weight on rotator (score: 1): Author: n1lo@hotmail.com (Mark L.); Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 13:07:38 GMT; Hello Jack, As reported in prior posts, having some weight on the rotator is a good thing, as they are designed for a vertical load, which helps keep their bearings seated and wearing evenly. This al; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00169.html (7,835 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Antenna weight on rotator (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 08:53:00 -0500; I do not believe you can make a blanket statement like that. I do not buy for one minute that pressure on the rotor is needed for sealing, or any reason. The use of two thrust bearings is ideal, as t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00172.html (8,975 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]