- 21. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 19:00:12 +0100
- I guess there are many different ways of looking at the issue; here's another. If I have a system comprising: Source(50 matching unit so that the Source is presented with a 50 Ohm load, as far as the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00101.html (8,696 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 14:19:05 -0400
- It does however change what the rig sees as the antenna impedance. (R, L, and C). So whether you change the antenna height or length, or stick a "tuner" in the line the results are the same, so call
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00103.html (10,497 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 14:22:06 -0400
- Roger, Wrong quote. I believe that was from KA5M. Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contestin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00104.html (8,472 bytes)
- 24. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 14:25:20 -0400
- On 5/6/2014 2:22 PM, Paul Christensen wrote: On 5/6/2014 1:33 PM, Paul Christensen wrote: "But the antenna tuner does not change the feedpoint impedance of the antenna which in my view would be actua
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00105.html (8,964 bytes)
- 25. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
- Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 04:47:04 -0500
- Thanks to all who commented. This has been an interesting discussion. 73, Marsh, KA5M _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00117.html (8,160 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu