Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+software\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: kb0mzg" <kb0mzg@contesting.com (kb0mzg)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 10:51:10 -0600
As I understand it K6STI is no longer producing antenna software. If this is true what does the tower talk gang suggest for modeling? I am especially interested in stacking yagi antennas. Tnx & Merry
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00402.html (7,346 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 13:22:03 -0500
Hi Tom, K6STI is back in business and now distributing YO7.0 by word of mouth. Cost is $100.00 per copy. 73, Joe, W1JR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertal
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00404.html (8,042 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: ValErwin@aol.com (ValErwin@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:15:09 EST
Joe: Do ya' happen to know if K6STI's antenna modeling software is also capable of handling trapped dipoles, EDZ's, Windoms, etc.?? Val W5PUT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.htm
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00405.html (7,048 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:26:56 -0500
YO is Yagi Optimizer, but if he is in business again, he would probably sell you a copy of NEC-wires. IMO, K6STI's stuff is fine quality, but for general purpose modeling software EZNEC is much easie
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00406.html (7,743 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: "W4PV" <w4pv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:54:18 -0400
Hello, I have been considering various antenna design/analysis programs, such as the Teri software program. I would like the groups opinions on the various pro's and con's of this and other antenna d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00068.html (6,627 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:30:11 -0400
Simple to use and reasonably accurate - and free is MMANA Hello, I have been considering various antenna design/analysis programs, such as the Teri software program. I would like the groups opinions
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00071.html (7,961 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:54:19 -0700
I use 4nec2, also free, uses the NEC2 engine by default, has a graphical editor (which I've not used.. I'm used to generating nec decks) and a fair number of display and output options, as well as a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00075.html (8,477 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:33:04 -0700
I would add, though, that probably the most important part of a modeling tool is the user interface. You need to be comfortable entering YOUR antennas and looking at the data. Teri's interface is fai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00076.html (8,270 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:04:07 -0800
Scott MacKenzie wrote: ""Simple to use and reasonably accurate"" "Reasonably" is the key word for all the modeling programs available. They are a very useful as a guide but they are not the 'end-all-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00077.html (10,128 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:23:01 +0100
Patrick, As others have said, it mostly comes down to personal choice about the interface. The underlying "calculating engines" are the same. I'd suggest you get hold of MMANA and the free version of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00082.html (8,272 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: N6FD <n6fd@mchsi.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:24:20 -0700
I also use 4nec2 and have used EZNEC as well. Right now 4nec2 works better for me. The user interface has some quirks, but is good for getting basic designs in. You have to be careful when using real
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00083.html (10,002 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: Tom McDermott <tom.mcdermott4@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Here's another vote for 4NEC2.  Particularly helpful is the 3D visualization of the pattern in multi-colors. Everyone I show a pattern to on-screen instant understands the antenna pattern when they s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00086.html (8,466 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis Petrich" <radioart@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 17:01:18 -0500
I've been using EZNEC for over 13 years and I'm up to EZNEC +5. It has the 3D capability as well as an easy way to connect transmission lines and sources to wires and each other..... Compare antennas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00088.html (9,582 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:11:29 -0700
Actually, modern modeling tools can very precisely predict the behavior of the antenna being modeled. It's not unusual in a professional setting to "build to print" from the model and if the performa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00089.html (10,738 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: " KZ4USA" <videorov@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:56:03 -0400
Ive found that NECWIN Synth lets you build all those types of objects that might be around your antenna. tower,building, cars,truck etc. Its a pretty cool 3d object builder and does it without using
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00094.html (8,425 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna software (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:44:35 -0700
The challenge would be not in entering the geometry, but in figuring what to make the wire properties/loading for the objects. Say you put in a wiregrid mesh for a house. What conductivity do you ass
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00099.html (8,614 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu