Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+choices\s*$/: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Perry K4PWO" <k4pwo@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:31:23 -0500
And the Tennadyne stands up to ice and wind well. I've had over an inch of ice on mine - looked like a sick buzzard - along with 60 mph wind gusts. As soon as the ice melted the elements straightened
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00054.html (9,524 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:49:01 -0400
"...actually I find that M2 is right on in their numbers no specmanship here whatsoever." Then look here at the on-line M2 spec for their 12L LPDA model: "Gain 6.8 dBi / 11.6 dBi @ 45' " The gain is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00055.html (10,118 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 08:23:39 -0700
I can understand your concern about claiming a single gain spec for a wide range of frequencies, but the ONLY practical gain spec for a real world antenna is to spec it at a specific frequency ... an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00056.html (12,373 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:37:39 -0400
specmanship here whatsoever. How did you determine that? Inquiring minds want to know. Cheers, Steve K7LXC _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00057.html (8,183 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: Dan Maguire via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:09:08 -0700
For more on that see the third section on this page: http://ac6la.com/aecollection4.html Dan, AC6LA _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00058.html (8,423 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 12:33:44 -0700
Here's another data point. The Force 12 C31XR has 31 foot boom, 3 full size elements 20, 4 full size elements on 15 and 7 full size elements on 10 . Here is an interesting comparison of the performan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00059.html (9,953 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:06:38 -0400
Worth noting when evaluating the N2IC report is that the C31XR has an effective boom length of 25 feet on 20 meters, 22 feet on 15 meters, and 25 feet on 10 meters. The C31XR compares favorably with,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00060.html (11,007 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 15:25:37 -0500
That is very interesting data! Has anyone modeled a SteppIR with a comparable boom length? John KK9A Here's another data point. The Force 12 C31XR has 31 foot boom, 3 full size elements 20, 4 full si
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00061.html (9,090 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:41:49 -0700
Google found these. When I was making my purchase decision, I saw other work that looked like it was well done. http://p02.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/steppIR_Ms_ENGL_REV16DEC10.pdf http://www.k6sg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00062.html (9,196 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:48:29 -0700
On Tue,4/7/2015 1:06 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: Worth noting when evaluating the N2IC report is that the C31XR has an effective boom length of 25 feet on 20 meters, 22 feet on 15 meters, and 25 feet
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00063.html (10,978 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:42:32 -0400
Here are some model comparisons for various SteppIR models vs. other "multi-monoband" yagis done at various times several (8 - 10) years ago: Here is a comparison of the three and four element SteppI
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00064.html (13,405 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 19:57:02 -0500
How did you determine that? Inquiring minds want to know. Cheers,Steve K7LXC I used their manuals and created models for the 20M4DX, the 20M5LGS, the 20M5, the 15M6DX and the 10M7DX. All of the resu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00065.html (9,639 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:46:57 -0500
Hi all, A few questions: 1. I'm not disputing the quality of the Optibeam, but for comparisons, a JK Tribander, at least when details were last available on the JK site, was less than $1k. It looks b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00069.html (14,180 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:07:48 -0500
It was an interesting article by K6IF and W6BD although I am not sure why the gain figures in the chart do not match the text. The C-31XR and 4el SteppIR are two very different technologies and yet t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00088.html (9,708 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 06:37:08 -0400
Snip I'm wondering if there have been any attempts at more than 4 element SteppIR's? I'm happy with my 4L but it would be nice to have some more smoke. What might be interesting are some longer boom
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00099.html (10,974 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: Bry Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:56:47 -0400
Mass production always lowers the price. That is not a fair comparison. Somebody somewhere is quite happily making Cushcraft antennas for a much lower price than these multi thousand dollar antennas.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00108.html (10,534 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:26:30 -0700
For mass production you need a mass market. I don't think there is one anymore. Optibeam pretty much builds to order (although of course they stock parts and tubing), and given the variety of models
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00112.html (11,739 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:34:38 -0400
Setting up an assembly line for low volume products is an expensive proposition. Then again, other than fixtures for drilling holes and making custom insulators, what in building antenna "kits" can b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00114.html (12,788 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:35:45 -0700
I'm wondering if there have been any attempts at more than 4 element SteppIR's? I'm happy with my 4L but it would be nice to have some more smoke. What might be interesting are some longer boom more
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00128.html (9,685 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:46:12 -0700
On 4/10/15 10:34 AM, Roger (K8RI) on TT wrote: Setting up an assembly line for low volume products is an expensive proposition. Then again, other than fixtures for drilling holes and making custom in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00129.html (10,771 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu