Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Answer\s+to\s+Pete\'s\s+$N4ZR$\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Answer\s+to\s+Pete\'s\s+$N4ZR$\s+Question\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Answer to Pete's (N4ZR) Question (score: 1): Author: sbest@cushcraft.com (sbest@cushcraft.com); Date: Tue, 25 Aug 98 13:32:12; Pete: Let's start with the simplest case. The 50 ohm antenna fed with 50 ohm coax, balun (1:1) and 50 ohm transmitter. Let's first assume that the coax and balun are lossless. If we deliver 1000 Watt; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00810.html (12,193 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Answer to Pete's (N4ZR) Question (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com (TexasRF@aol.com); Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 14:41:11 EDT; It is appropriate at this point in the loss discussion to move from the theoretical to real world. In the real world, the matched line would be 200 ft of RG213/U coax, the balanced line would be 200f; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00814.html (8,150 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Answer to Pete's (N4ZR) Question (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 16:13:55 -0700; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> OK so far... Why are you now introducing a 2 dB/100 ft. loss factor to line that is at HF essentially lossless? What is the purpose for doing this? It is not necessary; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00826.html (12,384 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Answer to Pete's (N4ZR) Question (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 23:28:12 -0400 (EDT); Honest, I've really tried to stay out of this thread. Now it is almost humorous except that a lot of bum info is being pushed onto some pretty naive newcomers. Steve Best says the following: Bad assu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00843.html (13,357 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Answer to Pete's (N4ZR) Question (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:49:23; lines higher Gerald got to the point much more clearly and directly than I did. There is no "automatic" additional loss in the unmatched case, unless you artificially make the feedline have the same; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00860.html (8,994 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]