Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Amateur\s+Radio\s+Tower\s+Ordinances\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6ZZ <bob.selbrede@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:59:44 -0500
Are there any good examples out there that a municipality could adopt/copy to create a reasonable ordnance for Ham Radio towers? My new QTH doesnt have anything specific for Ham Radio but they do for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00043.html (7,976 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Ron WV4P <wv4ptn@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:22:56 -0600
There are no rules for ham so you want them to create some ? That makes zero sense. Ron, WV4P _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00044.html (8,819 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: "Martin A. Flynn" <maflynn@theflynn.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:35:09 -0500
Actually it does - Do you want your 30 foot Rohn 25 tower bracketed to your house classified by the same rules as a cell / pcs  or Commercial two-way tower? Ron, WV4P Are there any good examples out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00045.html (9,577 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 23:35:05 +0000 (UTC)
Why do you need an ordinance? Wes  N7WS On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 04:00:09 PM MST, Bob K6ZZ <bob.selbrede@gmail.com> wrote: Are there any good examples out there that a municipality could ad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00046.html (8,749 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6ZZ <bob.selbrede@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:38:45 -0500
I would only suggest a more reasonable ordinance if they insisted on applying the PCS ordinance to Ham Radio. If they tell me there are no applicable ordinances and give me a green light, Im certainl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00047.html (10,617 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:53:19 -0600
You are in California. There is a state law that requires local governments to treat you quite reasonably. They cannot apply the PCS and commercial ordinances to ham radio antenna systems. It is easy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00048.html (12,043 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:57:32 -0800
I initially had this problem in San Mateo County, near SF. The Planning Dept. wanted to issue me a "conditional use permit" which would need to be renewed every year. I explained this is not a tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00049.html (10,564 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: JOHN OWENS <ham38john@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:00:33 -0800 (PST)
If they do not have a specific requirement for ham radio towers, then it sounds like you do not have a requirement. Federal Regulation PRB-1 requires that municipalities provide reasonable accomodati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00050.html (9,776 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Steve Muenich <srmuenich@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:16:41 -0600
If it aint broke, Dont fix it. Steve, NA5C Sent from my mobile device _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00051.html (10,459 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6ZZ <bob.selbrede@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 19:36:56 -0500
Hi Jack, Im in the process of moving from CA to KY. Im aware of PRB-1 and will certainly bring it up if needed. Ive got a meeting with the county building department director on Tuesday afternoon. My
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00052.html (12,684 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:16:58 -0600
From the City of Ozark Missouri: https://ecode360.com/28909976?highlight=tower,towers&searchId=9695514651952489 /Exemptions./An antenna andtowerfor the following uses are *exempt from these requireme
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00054.html (14,230 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:26:36 -0800
Bob -- You are on the right track. It's a creeping problem where local agencies here in Calif have adopted extensive "wireless facility" ordinances requiring hearings, reports, and expensive fees and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00056.html (9,200 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: "Steven Gehring" <steven.gehring@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 22:01:39 -0900
Bob, Please review the following for ideas. Alaska law makes sense here. Alaska Statutes 2022 Sec. 29.35.141. Regulation of radio antennas. (a) A municipality that regulates the placement, screening,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00057.html (11,348 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Brinkley" <nc4ab@nc4ab.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:26:29 -0500
Bob - Good luck with the move!! Hopefully Tennessee is accommodating as North Carolina is for Antenna Support Structures - notice I did not use the word Tower, the word tower apparently has a differe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00058.html (17,130 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:40:09 -0500
This is not about ordinances - unless that is your real goal ? its about obtaining a building permit. If there is literally no discussion about ham radio towers ? then the likely issue is only auxili
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00059.html (9,651 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 09:29:26 -0600
Did you see my posting from the City of Ozark? Its even better. If its an amateur antenna tower, its exempt! No permits needed. Now that's freedom! Jim W7RY This is not about ordinances - unless that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00061.html (10,961 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: "wb0m@flashdog.us" <wb0m@flashdog.us>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:01:59 -0600
"There are no rules for ham so you want them to create some ? That makes zero sense. Actually, it does. It would be better leading and guiding a new ordinance than having a bunch of others opposed to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00062.html (8,524 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6ZZ <bob.selbrede@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:51:40 -0500
I did! Thats a great example. I like the idea of putting exempt language in the code. Removes any doubt. Thanks! Bob K6ZZ Thanks! Bob Sent from my iPhone _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00063.html (9,410 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu