- 41. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:41:24 -0700
- Mario: That is nice but all your reference document links say 80mph, 90 mph etc. but do not say what exposure, whether the wind velocity is fastest mile or 3 sec gust or what loading specification th
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00110.html (12,616 bytes)
- 42. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: EZ Rhino <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:41:51 -0600
- 10 ACRES!!! For the love of mike, buy a bulldozer not a tower! I'd kill for 10 acres for an antenna farm. Chris KF7P Darn! I was hoping that everyone would either love or hate aluminium towers so I c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00111.html (9,242 bytes)
- 43. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: <john@kk9a.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:56:52 -0800
- I had a 70' Universal Tower in IL and a 50' one in Aruba http://www.qrz.com/db/p40a . In Aruba it held up very well to the elements compared to my Rohn 55g tower which severe corrosion and required a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00115.html (10,200 bytes)
- 44. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:19:33 -0700
- What is special about the base for this tower that eliminates the need for a rebar cage? Is the base itself a metal framework that functions as a rebar cage or something? Rick N6RK __________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00116.html (8,788 bytes)
- 45. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: n8de@thepoint.net
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:30:54 -0400
- Rick, This may answer your question: http://www.universaltowers.com/bases.html 73 Don N8DE _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk ma
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00117.html (9,717 bytes)
- 46. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@charter.net>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:42:10 -0400
- My impression is that the 21.06sf is the wind loading of the tower itself. 73 Alan NV8A _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk maili
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00118.html (10,767 bytes)
- 47. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:55:28 -0600
- I would love to hear from a concrete engineer type if not using rebar is good idea or not. Mike W0MU W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net _______________________________________________ _______________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00119.html (10,263 bytes)
- 48. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 19:38:10 -0700
- It seems like you would have to dig a triangular hole for this to be valid. That ought to be a neat trick. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ __________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00120.html (9,270 bytes)
- 49. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: "Mario" <marionow@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 23:26:29 -0400
- I understand your question, but I have no answer for it. To get these details I would suggest to contact them directly. Bill Kedzierski 586-463-2560 univ@voyager.net Mario: That is nice but all your
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00122.html (13,270 bytes)
- 50. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: <john@kk9a.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:58:58 -0800
- I guess you started the guying a freestanding tower discussion again. Hi Jerry, I have a Universal Tower in my back yard and am happy with it. As it is only part Universal (and part Heights) I decide
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00142.html (8,225 bytes)
- 51. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: w4lde <rwalters@numail.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:05:07 -0400
- I wouldn't rule out the Aluma Tower made in Florida. The easiest installation I have been involved with. i have the HX50 which is 50ft and a SteppIR 3-element with 30/40 meter added wind-load and hav
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00145.html (9,491 bytes)
- 52. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: "Gedas" <w8bya@mchsi.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:39:07 -0400
- I have 3 Universal towers; one 50' and two 70'. The 50' I have had up for 30 years at two different QTH's and I purchased it 2nd hand. Who knows how old it is. The two 70' towers have been up for abo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00152.html (12,881 bytes)
- 53. [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry stowell" <lclarks@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:12:30 -0400
- Just for a heads-up take a look at Aluma Towers web site and the "Smart Tower" http://www.alumatower.com/smart_tower.html I have no connection with Aluma just a very satisfied customer. 73 Larry K1ZW
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00163.html (8,580 bytes)
- 54. [TowerTalk] aluminum towers (score: 1)
- Author: ronald long <rlong3@columbus.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:36:44 -0400
- I have had an 80ft Heights Al tower up since 1976, and I bought it used back then! TH-11 on top. The first three sections might be unique in that the tubing is 0.25inch wall thickness. I originally i
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00165.html (8,305 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu