Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Aircom\s+Plus\s+Coax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Aircom\s+Plus\s+Coax\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Aircom Plus Coax (score: 1): Author: csudds@probe.net (Chuck Sudds); Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 16:22:56 -0500; Has anyone had any experience, either pro or con, with the brand of low-loss coax known as AirCom Plus? I saw their ad in this months QST magazine (page 154) and it sounded pretty good. Comments?? Ch; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00430.html (7,154 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Aircom Plus Coax (score: 1): Author: n8ug@juno.com (n8ug@juno.com); Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 14:42:56 -0500; HELLO CHUCK, WE'VE WATCHED THE CLAIMS OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS, AND IN GENERAL IT IS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER, IN THE .400" SIZE, THAN THE VARIOUS LOW LOSS COAXES ALREADY POPULAR, UNTIL YOU GET; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00457.html (9,310 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Aircom Plus Coax (score: 1): Author: DavisRFinc@aol.com (DavisRFinc@aol.com); Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 16:03:54 EDT; Chuck, I agree with my esteemed colleague, Press Jones' overall remarks. Also, to market this using RG213 as the comparative is ludicrous. Regards, Steve davis, KPEK DAVIS RF Co. DAVIS RF Co., Commer; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00458.html (7,598 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]