Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ALTERNATIVE\s+TRIBANDER\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ALTERNATIVE\s+TRIBANDER\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] ALTERNATIVE TRIBANDER (score: 1): Author: CubexCo@aol.com; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:54:55 EST; WHAT IS YOUR PREFERRED TRIBANDER FOR CONTESTING? NO GREATER THAN 9 SQUARE FEET OF WINDLOAD. TNX, MIKE, VE4MM == Mike, I have noted with interest the responses you have received and the many exchanges; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00756.html (7,727 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] ALTERNATIVE TRIBANDER (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:02:58 -0500; I endorse this idea. I have also found in A/B tests with yagis, that quads can be a lot quieter on receive, which can be very helpful at times! One time I was single band 15 in the ARRL DX CW with 8/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00757.html (11,742 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] ALTERNATIVE TRIBANDER (score: 1): Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:03:07 -0500; 1. A quad is a compromise in a since because it is the same a 2 stacked shortened yagis with a separation of only 1/4 wavelength. It can be viewed as two 1/4 wavelength yagi driven or parasitic eleme; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00766.html (7,816 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] ALTERNATIVE TRIBANDER (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:46:39 -0600; Hi Bill, I think you may be misunderstanding a quad antenna: A quad element is not a bent dipole or a shortened element in any way. It is a full-wave loop, an antenna that by itself exhibits gain ove; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00771.html (10,575 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] ALTERNATIVE TRIBANDER (score: 1): Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:43:57 -0500; My experience is that a quad is often quieter. I realize there is not a good analytic reason for this (or, at least, none has been found yet). I used a Cubex 5-band quad for several years and it was; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00786.html (8,720 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] ALTERNATIVE TRIBANDER (score: 1): Author: "larryjspammenot@teleport.com" <larryj@teleport.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:17:01 -0800 (GMT-08:00); When you use a remote coax switch to switch one of five bands in a 5-band Quad, should the coax switch be setup to ground the unused bands' driven elements, or to let them "float"? Some remote coax s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00795.html (10,416 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] ALTERNATIVE TRIBANDER (score: 1): Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:37:57 -0500; I did ground the loops that were not in use. I did this by default (because the relay was set up that way). I do not know if there is a "correct" choice. Bill -- W2WO _______________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00800.html (8,039 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]