Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+A25R\s+or\s+TX7L\s+on\s+1\.8\s+or\s+3\.5\s+MHz\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+A25R\s+or\s+TX7L\s+on\s+1\.8\s+or\s+3\.5\s+MHz\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] A25R or TX7L on 1.8 or 3.5 MHz?? (score: 1): Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 06:15:19 -0800; I missed A25R on 3.5 last night by a minute or so as my amp didn't warm up quickly enough; but I haven't seen them or TX7L spotted on 1.8 MHz, or TX7L on 3.5. Are they on those bands? Should be a cra; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00001.html (7,636 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] A25R or TX7L on 1.8 or 3.5 MHz?? (score: 1): Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 06:31:58 -0800; My apologies, meant to send this to the Top Band reflector. SteveH, K0XP On 11/8/2023 6:15 AM, Steve Harrison wrote: I missed A25R on 3.5 last night by a minute or so as my amp didn't warm up quickly; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00002.html (7,559 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] A25R or TX7L on 1.8 or 3.5 MHz?? (score: 1): Author: JP <jp@ezoom.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 07:20:00 -0800; Well, to make it about antennas, I did see a post on DX News about TX7L completing their 80 meter antenna so they should be QRV. Nothing about 160 though. Ive worked A25R on 80, havent listened for t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00003.html (8,459 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]