Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+4\s+sq\s+shortened\s+vs\s+full\s+sized\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+4\s+sq\s+shortened\s+vs\s+full\s+sized\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80m 4 sq shortened vs full sized (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:30:56 -0600; Sorry, Brain was out thinking the typing fingers LOL! I forgot the subject which would have helped too. Yes we are on the same page. Bandwidth is worth considering. "A slip of the foot you may soon r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00252.html (9,247 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m 4 sq shortened vs full sized (score: 1): Author: Joe Reisert <Joe@Reisert.org>; Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:07:33 -0400; Mike etal, I am using such an antenna. I significantly modified 4 MFJ-1792's to work on 80 meters. I first used 16 but later upgraded to 32 1/4 WL radials on each antenna and a Comtek combiner. The f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00272.html (11,892 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]