Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80Meter\s+Coverage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80Meter\s+Coverage\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80Meter Coverage (score: 1): Author: ac9s@mchsi.com; Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:53:25 +0000; I am thinking of running two commonly fed inverted Vs, cut for CW and SSB to get coverage across the full 80 meter band. I should be able to space them at right angles. Has anyone tried this and if s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00050.html (6,798 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80Meter Coverage (score: 1): Author: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:21:48 -0500 (CDT); Keith: FWIW: I constructed a portable crossed inverted-V antenna for RACES and MARS work and for Scout demos, etc. The dipole wires on mine are cut for different bands and connected to one piece of c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00059.html (8,001 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80Meter Coverage (score: 1): Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:34:12 -0700; With orthogonal inverted Vees, there is still some coupling between the two because of the vertically polarized components. Even so, it's not hard to tune them for less then 2:1 SWR over the entire 8; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00075.html (8,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]