Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+meter\s+inv\s+V\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+meter\s+inv\s+V\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1): Author: Marv Shelton <marvs@att.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:21:26 -0700; Doesn't the take-off angle increase as the apex angle increases? Sent from my iPad And YES it's cool! _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00489.html (8,241 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1): Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:15:54 -0500; Suppose the ends of the 80M inverted V were each raised to 90 feet - the height of the apex of the original inverted V. The apex angle would increase to 180 degrees and the antenna would be a flat-to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00490.html (7,807 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1): Author: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:04:17 -0500; Another consideration: As you increase the apex angle, the feed impedance will increase and the radiation pattern will no longer be Omni-directional. A Mismatch can result in offsetting any expected; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00495.html (10,226 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1): Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:47:57 -0500; With a 90 foot high apex and the ends supported by 35-foor masts, it will be possible to maintain about a 90 degree enclosed angle, a good match, a close-to omni-directional pattern, and increased ga; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00496.html (11,366 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1): Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:33:15 -0700; Jim, I see your point. I have easy to install (and extend up in the air) telescoping supports for the ends of the V. I've found I can go from 10 feet to 38 feet with them. I am going to test the ante; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00498.html (11,540 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:57:40 -0400; Don't forget about RBN possibilities for checking signal strengths. 73, Larry W6NWS --Original Message-- From: Robert Harmon Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 1:33 PM To: Ham - Tower Talk Subject: Re: [T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00499.html (12,328 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:59:31 -0500; I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish but just be aware that the dipole orientation will effect the results. John KK9A Jim, I see your point. I have easy to install (and extend up in the ai; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00500.html (8,038 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1): Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:44:41 -0700; thanks Larry, I did forget about the RBN. Great for this testing ! Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00503.html (14,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]