Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+75\s+or\s+70\s+Ohm\s+twinlead\s+or\s+ladderline\s+cable\s+\-\s+does\s+it\s+exist\?\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 05:31:26 -0700
The cable comprised 28x0.19mm copper strands inside a 3mm diameter PVC jacket. Zo was measured as 130 Ohms and Vf as 0.66. These were the Copper losses, Dielectric losses and Total matched losses per
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-03/msg00264.html (11,520 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:13:33 +0000
Jim, They do, by virtue of the way the data is derived! I make Open-Circuit and Short-Circuit S11 impedance measurements of the line; from which Zo=SQRT(Zoc.Zsc). Loss is determined from the input re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-03/msg00265.html (12,089 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:01:01 -0700
They do, by virtue of the way the data is derived! I make Open-Circuit and Short-Circuit S11 impedance measurements of the line; from which Zo=SQRT(Zoc.Zsc). Loss is determined from the input resista
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-03/msg00267.html (13,675 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:16:29 +0000
OK.. so you didn't actually independently measure the copper and dielectric loss (I haven't had my coffee yet, and I'm not sure how you would do that other than by how you did it); You fit the measur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-03/msg00268.html (13,813 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:43:40 +0000
Jim, I forgot to say that the line distributed parameters - R, L, G and C - are all directly calculable from Zoc and Zsc; to that extent you can then calculate the losses associated with R as distinc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-03/msg00269.html (11,231 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:32:57 -0700
At 1 MHz skin depth in copper is 2.5 mil/65 micron. AWG 24 wire is 20 mil/511 micron diameter, which is 8 times the skin depth. Start going much lower, or using AWG 40 wire, and that thin tube assum
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-03/msg00271.html (12,938 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:00:50 +0000
So it looks like we have an alternative to coax or open wire line to feed a dipole for example. If I took, say, #14 stranded, and twisted it, it would be a good match for a center fed dipole, low los
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-03/msg00298.html (11,770 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:18:37 -0400
Telephone C drop wire may work in your case and it is very strong. I believe the characteristic impedance is 70 ohms. On 3/24/2014 4:15 PM, jpk5lad@cox.net wrote: From where I'm sitting, I can see a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00276.html (10,824 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:01:42 -0400
In the 70's, there was a product named 'Saucerline' .. which had circular plastic insulators which were donut-shaped. It was 75 ohm line. 73 Don N8DE Telephone C drop wire may work in your case and i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00284.html (12,074 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu