- 1. [TowerTalk] 45G Tower (score: 1)
- Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:21:02 +0000
- I also have a 120 ft. 45 up using the same tapered base. Some piks found at: http://www.qsl.net/nidxa/kb9cry/kb9cry_40meterAnt.htm I'll be happy to share my experiences. Phil KB9CRY _________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00398.html (6,886 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: starrose444@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:05:13 -0400 (EDT)
- Again thanks for all the information about using a mid section for a base.This is my first tower so I want to do it right.I have 8 10ft 45g sections and one 45ag top section would like to make two to
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00155.html (6,795 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:10:20 -0400
- Go to http://rohnnet.com/rohn-45g-tower and download or view the 45G Brochure which shows various configurations and recommended bases/guy anchors. _______________________________________________ ___
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00156.html (8,246 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:08:47 -0500
- Bob, All this is just opinion: I suggest that you consider putting up one tower and making it about 85 feet tall. There would be four fewer holes to dig, fill with anchors, concrete, etc. You would o
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00167.html (9,808 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:06:23 -0700
- As you have noted, terrain has a major effect on an antenna's vertical pattern. I would not even consider making a recommendation about antenna height before running Dean Straw's HFTA software (free
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00171.html (7,570 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:47:28 -0400
- The Rohn 45G brochure shows a round base 2'6" in diameter, 4 feet in the ground, with 6" above ground, with pier pin for towers up to 150' at 110mph wind. Same base is OK for up to 200' at lower wind
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00172.html (11,674 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:01:57 -0600
- I would still build the rebar cage with or without the base section. -- J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011 CQ WW DX CW _______________________________________________ _____________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00176.html (12,768 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:19:22 -0400
- I agree. I have rebar in my base. The 45GSR (?, solid side rails) has a base with a short base in it and it has but no vertical rebar. Its base is bigger (4'6" square and 4 foot depth, 3 cu yd of con
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00177.html (15,254 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:45:13 -0400
- What we need is a "Steppir" tower. In the 1980's I operated at a station with stacked yagis. We could often open 20M early with all three yagis connected. But as time went on the propagation would ch
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00178.html (12,398 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:16:49 -0400
- 100 feet, if possible, is nice. Great for 40, for 80m halfwave slopers and 160m quarterwave slopers. Pretty good most of the time on 20, especially for longer paths. Perhaps a little high at times on
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00195.html (14,513 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu