Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+43\s+foot\s+Vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+43\s+foot\s+Vertical\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 foot Vertical (score: 1): Author: "Jay" <jayt@arraysolutions.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 09:07:29 -0500 (EST); "This method is sort of the reverse of the system in the recent NCJ where Jay, WX0B, made his vertical longer than 1/4 wave so he could cancel the reactance with a series capacitor. Here you deal wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00141.html (7,951 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 foot Vertical (score: 1): Author: "Jay" <jayt@arraysolutions.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 09:07:29 -0500 (EST); "This method is sort of the reverse of the system in the recent NCJ where Jay, WX0B, made his vertical longer than 1/4 wave so he could cancel the reactance with a series capacitor. Here you deal wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00142.html (7,531 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 foot Vertical (score: 1): Author: "Tod -MN" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:32:37 -0600; Jay, you are entirely correct. I did garble your article and I apologize. I clearly remembered the inductor from the pictures and for some reason decided you had made the antenna 'long' and then used; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00152.html (9,457 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 foot vertical (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:36:06 -0600; Frank W3LPL is correct. Your problem isn't your antenna, it is what you describe as a PITA tuner! I use a low loop and ladder line (_ladder line_ not window line) for ragchewing all the time. Sure I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00431.html (8,454 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]