Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40M\s+on\s+TH11\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40M\s+on\s+TH11\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40M on TH11 (score: 1): Author: Dennis W0JX via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:12:30 +0000 (UTC); Placing the 40M dipole parallel with the boom is the best approach if you can get it up 6 or 7 feet above the TH-11. Otherwise you can try to load the boom on 40 meters. You attach the shield to the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00121.html (7,310 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M on TH11 (score: 1): Author: Bill Cotter <n4lg@qx.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:48:32 -0500; I agree with Dennis that a simple gamma or omega match on the boom of the TH-11 would give you a decent antenna for 40m, high in the air. I would suggest using 12ft of 1" 6063 tubing, stood off the b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00125.html (8,858 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 40M on TH11 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 07:57:39 -0800; Placing the 40M dipole parallel with the boom is the best approach if you can get it up 6 or 7 feet above the TH-11. Otherwise you can try to load the boom on 40 meters. You attach the shield to the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00127.html (7,896 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M on TH11 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:00:14 -0800; Placing the 40M dipole parallel with the boom is the best approach if you can get it up 6 or 7 feet above the TH-11. Otherwise you can try to load the boom on 40 meters. You attach the shield to the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00128.html (7,941 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M on TH11 (score: 1): Author: "jcjacobsen@q.com" <jcjacobsen@q.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:38:18 -0500 (EST); How do, QST, Oct 2014 had article on adding 40 meters to a 24 ft boom Yagi (feedback in Dec 2014).. I also seem to recall that there was an article years ago on the subject, maybe adding to a 204BA..; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00135.html (7,882 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M on TH11 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:42:19 -0600; http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/pix/40boom.html 73, Jim - w5ifp@gvtc.com Yagi either _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00139.html (9,120 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M on TH11 (score: 1): Author: GALE STEWARD via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:28:33 +0000 (UTC); An old QST article (April 1974) shows how W9RX added a full length 40M aluminum tubing dipole to a TH6. You would probably have to dig up the magazine or the article may be available from the QST arc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00145.html (9,664 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M on TH11 (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:20:21 -0800; Don't count on anything you read in QST being right unless you see N0AX listed as the author. QST is not peer reviewed -- I regularly wince at one or more significant technical inaccuracies in every; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00154.html (8,343 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M on TH11 (score: 1): Author: "Magnus A" <sm6wet@telia.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:04:01 +0100; Jag har från och med 8:e mars inte längre tillgång till denna mejl pga en tjänsteresa. Om du försöker att anmäla dig till VII:e graden i Skara 13/3 så var sista anmälningsdatum söndagen 6/3. Jag komm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00183.html (8,131 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]