Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40\s+meters\s+in\s+combination\s+with\s+30\s+meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40\s+meters\s+in\s+combination\s+with\s+30\s+meters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40 meters in combination with 30 meters (score: 1): Author: terry burge <ki7m@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 11:49:11 -0700 (PDT); Hi folks, Has anyone tried putting 30 meters on something like a 40 meter rotatable dipole with any luck. Being non-harmonic related I'm not sure they would work together. For the first time last nig; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-08/msg00132.html (7,222 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meters in combination with 30 meters (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul.kelley.n1bug@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:19:03 -0400; Hi Terry, I asked this question a couple of months ago. Several people did some modeling and say it should work fine. I have built a full size 40 meter rotatable dipole and plan to add 30 meters to i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-08/msg00133.html (8,545 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meters in combination with 30 meters (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:59:19 +0000 (UTC); My first thought would be traps for 30 meters rather than a parallel dipole off the same feedline. It will shorten the 40 a bit and narrow the bandwidth but that is not usually a problem on 40. Trapp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-08/msg00285.html (7,803 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]