Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40\s+m\s+beam\s+at\s+16\s+m\s+high\s+$summary$\s+LONG\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40\s+m\s+beam\s+at\s+16\s+m\s+high\s+$summary$\s+LONG\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40 m beam at 16 m high (summary) LONG (score: 1): Author: jurgen.geldhof@skynet.be (Jurgen Geldhof); Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 11:00:36 +0100; Hi, Sorry for the delay but here's the summary of the answers I received to my question whether it would be worth the trouble (and money) to put up a 40 m 2 elt. beam at only 16 m. high. ** I had a 4; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00471.html (13,427 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]