- 1. [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:27:56 -0500
- As opposed to those who read specs and compare antennas that way, I actually have a three element F12 Mag340N and I can say first hand that it is an incredible product. It has been up for two or thre
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00377.html (7,110 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Kass" <timkass@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:03:24 -0400
- Well, this may be more bold than your considering, but I'm currently building a Moxon beam for 40 meters on a 15 foot boom, will use 35 - 40 foot DE/REF elements, with large coils at mid-element poin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00381.html (8,848 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:05:58 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- I will have to find it on my other computer, but a person took a Cushcrap 40-2CD and converted it to a rigid MOXON. If I find the link, I'll post it. Well, this may be more bold than your considering
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00383.html (7,892 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:44:04 -0700
- My earlier message is slightly flawed, but I found what I was looking for... http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/towertalk/2004-May/064261.html Dino...k6rix@earthlink.net __________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00385.html (8,971 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: <kk9a@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:43:45 -0000
- Are the dimensions for this antenna available anywhere? John My earlier message is slightly flawed, but I found what I was looking for... http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/towertalk/2004-May/0642
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00389.html (7,608 bytes)
- 6. [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: <kk9a@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:29:35 -0000
- I guess I found the W6NL 40m Moxon dimensions in an AO format http://www.kkn.net/dayton2004/W6NL40.ant I compared the antenna to my homebrew 2 element full size 40m beam - the gain is nearly identica
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00391.html (8,256 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:38:54 -0700
- http://www.kkn.net/dayton2004/W6NL_40.gif Dino...k6rix@earthlink.net _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Sta
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00400.html (8,982 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:08:08 +0100
- Les Moxon (G6XN, SK) would have been delighted with that application of his ideas. He always liked to think of 2-element beams being instantly reversible. If the two elements are made identical, the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00401.html (8,637 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 05:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
- I'd like to see the actual physical dimensions of the Moxon conversion. Might consider modifying my 40-2CD at some point. Anyone have these? 73, Stew K3ND http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/towert
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00403.html (10,327 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 M beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Newman <mnewman@clear.net.nz>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:09:47 +1200
- Hi all Has anyone modelled the Moxon loop with loading coils to further reduce the length of the elements, and if so what happened to the near 50 ohm impedance of the normal Moxon? Thanks MikeN ZL1BN
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00431.html (8,157 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu