- 1. [TowerTalk] 4 SQ arrays (score: 1)
- Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@adelphia.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:29:58 -0500
- For those using Comtek and other boxes that restrict one to 90 and 180 degree phasing, you can get an improved pattern by increasing the spacing between elements. A half wave across the diagonal seem
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00567.html (8,267 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 SQ arrays (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:06:59 +0100
- Improved in what way? Did a quick check in NEC. When going to about 1.5 wl spaceing, that will give about 2 wl on the diagonal, two strong aditional back loobes comes up in low elevation. Hardly does
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00570.html (8,955 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 SQ arrays (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Muller" <jerry@k0tv.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:29:17 -0500
- Actually you want to go to sqrt(2)/4 spacing. The gain and front to back improve slightly. 73, Jerry K0TV Improved in what way? Did a quick check in NEC. When going to about 1.5 wl spaceing, that wil
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00571.html (10,115 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 SQ arrays (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:51:45 +0100
- Now I see my error. I checked at .35 wl spacing and that will give about .5 wl on the diagonal. Don´t know why I wrote 1.5 wl and 2 wl below, my fingers are to fast for my brain. Anyway, at .35
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00572.html (11,034 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 SQ arrays (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:00:52 -0800
- At 04:51 PM 11/19/2004 +0100, Jan Erik Holm wrote: Now I see my error. I checked at .35 wl spacing and that will give about .5 wl on the diagonal. Don´t know why I wrote 1.5 wl and 2 wl below,
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00578.html (9,923 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu