Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+4\.3\-10\s+Connector\s+for\s+RG8\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:46:49 -0500
Does anyone have a source for quality 4.3-10 male connectors for RG8 size coax? The only ones that I found so far are at Pasternack for $66 each. John KK9A ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00236.html (6,980 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:51:37 -0400
Not to be dense....but, what is a4.3-10 ? Don N8DE _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00237.html (7,122 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:21:13 -0400
Fairview Microwave has them for LMR-400 for about $20. https://www.fairviewmicrowave.com/4.3-10-male-connectors-for-coax-category.aspx _______________________________________________ ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00238.html (8,263 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:25:45 -0400
When I first heard of these, I said to myself, what, another connector? If you are familiar with the 7/16 DIN connector, the 4.3-10 is a smaller one suitable for smaller cables. Rugged and can handle
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00239.html (9,231 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:51:02 -0500
Too bad theres no way to look something like that up, maybe some kind of global information network, perhaps? ;-) https://www.amphenolrf.com/connectors/4-3-10.html 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPhon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00240.html (8,564 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:19:00 -0400
If a company came up with a good way to look up things globally they would have billions of dollars in revenue. John KK9A Sent via the Samsung Galaxy 7 edge, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00241.html (9,872 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:09:33 -0400
It's not so much the appropriateness for smaller cables. The small DIN connectors - 4.1-9.5 & 4.3-10 - were developed in an attempt to make compact *jack fields* while retaining the PIM performance a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00242.html (10,191 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:38:16 -0400
You are correct, Steve, but along with more dense jackfields, one has to use smaller cables than, say 1-5/8. _______________________________________________ __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00243.html (10,262 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Glenn Pritchard <gpritchard7000@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:42:53 -0700
The 7/16 were For lower IMD performance Fromm 400 MHz up. The 4.3-10 are in shop, Weve used these for some time, if I have some available I can send them. Glenn, VA7UO Sent from my iPhone ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00244.html (10,115 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 22:28:35 -0400
You are correct, Steve, but along with more dense jackfields, one has to use smaller cables than, say 1-5/8. Bit of a circular argument I guess. If 1-5/8" cable was still being installed at cell sit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00245.html (8,788 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:52:11 +0200
4.3-10 connectors for 1 5/8" cable are available (male as well). https://products.spinner-group.com/4-3-10-female-connector-lf-1-5-8-50-multi fit-bn431022 73 Peter Bit of a circular argument I guess.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00246.html (9,559 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:35:56 -0400
Peter: Sure, they are available, but if your reason for using them is to make a denser jackfield, one would use a smaller cable. --73, Mike, WV2ZOW. _______________________________________________ __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00247.html (11,431 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:50:09 -0400
1-5/8" has never been used to connect directly to a jackfield, so I'm not sure where you're coming from. Large feedlines always transition to a 1/2" or smaller jumper when connecting to a multiport r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00248.html (10,796 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:02:47 -0400
So we are back at the beginning -- smaller connectors, smaller cable, denser jackfields. If you want to use them on 1-5/8 for some reason, they are out there. --Mike _________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00249.html (12,001 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:59:25 -0400
I've never seen a 4.3-10 used on a vertical feedline run of 7/8" or larger. 7-16 is standard. 7-16 is arguably more more rugged than 4.3-10 due to its larger size. 4.3-10 is used on smaller-size cabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00250.html (12,377 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:29:01 -0400
Yup. However, if big coax was still being run up cell towers, you would see 4.3-10 gradually appearing on those lines, to simplify jumper stock. A case could be made for manufacturers (including ham)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00251.html (10,301 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:00:28 -0400
Meh. It's pretty rare to see anything other than pre-fab jumpers being used any more for any carrier's installations. Hard-heads like me who still field-fabricate jumpers after having been burned to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00252.html (10,862 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:21:19 -0700
<I wish the ham world would eliminate UHF altogether, but I still run into <guys who refuse to even put a type N connector on coax, or if they do, they <use those solder-on ones that are made like UH
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00253.html (9,725 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Gedas <w8bya@mchsi.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:36:20 -0400
I don't know if this will be of any help to anyone but I have 9 NOS, in sealed bags, Huber-Suhner 4.3/10 "T" adapters available that I will not be needing. They are male DIN "input" to two female DIN
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00254.html (10,911 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: k7lxc--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:49:11 +0000 (UTC)
    Okay, I'll bite. What's a jackfield besides a village in England? Enquiring minds want to know. Cheers,Steve   K7LXC _______________________________________________ _____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00255.html (8,263 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu