Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+300\s+ft\s+tower\s+conundrum\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+300\s+ft\s+tower\s+conundrum\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 300 ft tower conundrum (score: 1): Author: "Michael J. Castellano" <km1r@cshore.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:02:57 -0500; My humble opinion... go with shorter towers in a better location. I have two 300 footers, and if it were not for the fact that my company owns them (I'm in the tower business), I would never put them; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00418.html (8,125 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 300 ft tower conundrum (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:05:17 -0500; Years ago when I was asked to go to A61AJ and help put up towers, put together yagis, and install them, I was presented with the first plan, a pair of 200-foot towers with long 2" masts and lots of b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00426.html (11,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]