Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+20m\s+\/\s+5\s+el\s+vs\s+4\s+el\s+1\/2\s+wave\s+boom\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 20m / 5 el vs 4 el 1/2 wave boom (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:09:33 -0400
All, Down to the wire here. Phone in-hand ready to place the order for a 20 meter monobander. It's either the Force12 5 element or the M2 4 element 20M4DX. Both have 1/2 wave booms - 36ft. I would as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00578.html (7,480 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] 20m / 5 el vs 4 el 1/2 wave boom (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 06:58:03 -0400
Both have 1/2 wave booms - 36ft. Tony, the best way to answer your question is to see full curves for Gain, F/R and SWR for both antennas...i.e. modeling. However, if you don't have those, here's my
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00598.html (8,027 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 20m / 5 el vs 4 el 1/2 wave boom (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Chadwick" <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:13:35 +0100
FWIW, I have replaced a 5el 20m beam (205BA) on a 34ft boom with a 4 ele Steppir at the same height. It's definitely no worse, and could well be better, so for reasons of weight and windage, I 'd go
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00612.html (7,713 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu