Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+2\s+element\s+40\s+beam\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 2 element 40 beam question (score: 1)
Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 21:16:11 EST
Does anyone have experience with a M2 2 element 40 meter beam or any other 2 element 40 meter beam that they feel has worked well for them- in the market but finding reviews hard to come by..........
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00465.html (7,038 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] 2 element 40 beam question (score: 1)
Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET)
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:28:48 -0600
It will eventually be replaced w/ a home-built COPY of a Telrex 40M346, which was Telrex's 40 meter yagi w/ 3 full-size elements on a 46' long boom. But in the meantime, the 40-2CD is a good CW anten
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00467.html (8,405 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] 2 element 40 beam question (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 02:15:34 EST
2 market Sure - the Cushcraft 240CD is a great antenna and the Cushcraft XM240 seems to be almost as good. The M2 (and F12) linear loading schemes have some compromises plus more time involved to get
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00472.html (7,447 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu