Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+RX\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+RX\s+antenna\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160 RX antenna (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:04:39 -0800; Hi all While playing on 160 in the RAC and Stew contest, I noticed something kinda strange here. I was trying to figure how I could hook up one of my other antennas for a RX antenna. I tried them all; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00478.html (7,021 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 RX antenna (score: 1): Author: Robert Morris <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:43:43 -0500; The only one with DC ground on the "driven" element ? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00483.html (8,170 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 RX antenna (score: 1): Author: "Alex Malyava" <alex.k2bb@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:26:54 -0500; Yeah, that sounds right. What do you guys think about GU4YOX receiving loop - http://www.gu4yox.com/CIMG0500.JPG ? I've listened to it, in VE3NE shack, and was really amazed, especially on 80m. It dr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00487.html (9,882 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 RX antenna (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:43:23 -0500; I've been using a flag RX antenna at my house in the suburbs of DC here and have had pretty good luck with it on 160m and 80m. It has a reasonable directive pattern but I don't think that's why it's; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00489.html (10,016 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 RX antenna (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:47:22 -0500; By the way, a down-in-my-noise* K9YC came back to me last night in the Stew like I was running a kilowatt into a full size vertical... He can sure hear... because he knows what he's talking about, mo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00490.html (8,135 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 RX antenna (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:51:56 -0500; I'm sorry, wrong G4, that's **G4HFQ** that wrote Polar Plot, not G4FGQ. http://www.g4hfq.co.uk/ It's pretty great if you're trying to assess directive antennas of any kind. __________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00491.html (7,837 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 RX antenna (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:49:03 -0800; For the Stew Perry, I constructed a 4 foot diameter "shielded" loop out of coax, as seen in various handbooks. The only difference was that I used a feed method of my own design because I didn't like; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00494.html (9,368 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 RX antenna (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:23:49 -0800; Dan, Thanks for the kind words, and for digging ME out of your noise. I can hear quite well here, both because I'm lucky to be able to live in a fairly quite place, and also because I've really worke; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00495.html (8,625 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]