Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[YCCC\]\s+Vertical\s+arrays\s+on\s+sloping\s+terrain\s+\-\s+opinionsplease\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[YCCC\]\s+Vertical\s+arrays\s+on\s+sloping\s+terrain\s+\-\s+opinionsplease\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [YCCC] Vertical arrays on sloping terrain - opinionsplease (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:34:06 -0500; Jim, That's a pretty steep hill. K4SQR told me the feedpoints should be at the same elevation. That caused me to find the flatest part of the hill I could for my 40m 4-sqr. The max difference in feed; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00882.html (9,861 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [YCCC] Vertical arrays on sloping terrain - opinionsplease (score: 1): Author: 'Jim Idelson' <k1ir@designet.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:45:33 -0500; Hope everyone interested gets a copy of this. Thanks to all who responded. So far, most of the responses were from those also looking for an answer, and from a few people who were willing to speculat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00005.html (11,691 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]