Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+With\s+Smoke\s+Detectors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+With\s+Smoke\s+Detectors\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] RFI With Smoke Detectors (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 14:49:29 -0400; Necessity is the mother of Innovation! I really do not like open wire feed lines. They allow you to match a high SWR (At the shack). Open wire to an unbalanced antenna will have a high common mode vo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00409.html (14,611 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] RFI With Smoke Detectors (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:39:15 -0700; The reason for chokes was "it was handy". Being lazy, I decided to try the second choke where the coax reached the tower as there was already a connector there. The only extra work that entailed was; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00414.html (10,865 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] RFI With Smoke Detectors (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:45:04 -0400; Thanks Jim, Thanks also for publishing that tutorial. I originally just made the choke part of the feed line. There are 6 loops so there are actually 7 passes through the cores, but that last pass re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00424.html (12,501 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] RFI With Smoke Detectors (score: 1): Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:15:38 -0700; Roger, Your experience with open wire line is interesting. I had a full size delta loop strung up for 80 meters off my tower and I fed it with ladder line. It picked way too much local noise. I took; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00448.html (17,023 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]