Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[OKDXA\]\s+Vertical\s+vs\s+Beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[OKDXA\]\s+Vertical\s+vs\s+Beam\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [OKDXA] Vertical vs Beam (score: 1): Author: Robert Redmon <k5sm.bob@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 17:47:39 -0500; John, No way, no how. If you want a practical demonstration, I will be glad to provide it. I have an AV640, which functions as a 3/8 wave on 40-6 meters. It performs well on 40 and 30 meters, as well; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00093.html (10,476 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [OKDXA] Vertical vs Beam (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:33:53 -0400; Bob -- I have an AV-640 in a box... looking to mount it soon... did you see a need to guy it up that high? Thanks for your take on it. == K8JHR == ..and the AV640 was up 20' at the base (then and now; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00156.html (8,772 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]