Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+158\,\s+Issue\s+20\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+158\,\s+Issue\s+20\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:06:59 -0800; Having tried a Beverage over a barb wire fence, it had poor performance. A Beverage needs a significantly lower conductivity ground underneath to develop the signal and barb wire is not that. Now tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00132.html (12,262 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1): Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:25:38 -0600; Grant, thanks for your input. I agree that cattle would not be Beverage friendly. I had some stock get next to the house once and they ate the coax that was running from the satellite dish to the hou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00143.html (11,437 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]