Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+those\s+4\s+foot\s+1\.5\"\s+fiberglass\s+army\s+surplus\s+tubes\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+those\s+4\s+foot\s+1\.5\"\s+fiberglass\s+army\s+surplus\s+tubes\.\.\.\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Fwd: those 4 foot 1.5" fiberglass army surplus tubes... (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:54:23 -0800; Several things to consider: 1. the mil surplus poles have a poor strength to weight ratio even if you solve the weak coupler problem. Laid up fiberglass tubing is the way to go. 2. no matter the mate; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00345.html (12,752 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]