Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+Posting\s+request\s+\-\s+Wire\s+Beams\s+for\s+30M\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [BULK] - Posting request - Wire Beams for 30M (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:39:10 -0700
John, a beam made of inverted vees, or upright vees, works the same as a beam made of straight elements. A quad is a beam made of loops and still follows all the rules of a beam. Of course you can do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00452.html (28,248 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] [BULK] - Posting request - Wire Beams for 30M (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:02:04 +0000
This is a fallacy which should end. Higher is not always better. You can get into a situation where there are 10 or more lobes, and each of those lobes will take a portion of the total power fed int
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00463.html (7,730 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] [BULK] - Posting request - Wire Beams for 30M (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:28:36 EDT
Higher USUALLY is better to a point. Having used a two element quad at 100 feet and two dipoles at 150 feet, I can tell you neither of those set ups was too high. Of course modeling is the way to go.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00469.html (7,369 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu