Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\(Repost\)\s+Engineering\s+advice\s+on\s+above\s+ground\s+foundation\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Looks like first post came out very difficult to read so here it is again. I have a rather complex situation that certainly can benefit from the collective wisdom and experience of this reflector. My
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00126.html (9,213 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: Joe - WDØM <wd0m@wd0m.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:36:04 -0600
Hi Rudy, My situation is similar, although different. I have an above ground base but without the water table issues. My problem was bedrock. The tower has been up for over 5 years without a problem,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00127.html (10,555 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:51:31 -0700
Your foundation is pinned to the bedrock ... his isn't. It seems to me that the opportunity for N2WQ to properly engineer his installation may have come and gone. 73, Dave AB7E ______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00129.html (11,547 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: Joe - WDØM <wd0m@wd0m.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:52:24 -0600
As I pointed out - similar, but my issue was bedrock, his is water table. It's never too late.... 73, Joe WDØM _______________________________________________ ________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00130.html (12,314 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:23:16 -0700
You have bedrock to help keep your base from settling, and your base is pinned to the bedrock to keep the lateral forces on the tower from tilting the base. He has a layer of gravel over a water tabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00131.html (15,200 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:28:17 -0700
I would not have worried about digging the hole and filling it full of concrete, any water in the hole would have been forced out and all would be good. Concrete does not care about water, concrete p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00132.html (15,625 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: Joe - WDØM <wd0m@wd0m.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:32:22 -0600
Not wanting to continue to re-state the obvious - my initial response stated there was a difference between our installations - would be nice if you would acknowledge that, rather than continue to pu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00133.html (17,135 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
All the books I have read say that in cold climates, foundations must go below the frost line, or there will be "heaving". You are clearly in violation of this dictum. Your only hope is to prevent an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00134.html (9,223 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mspencer12345@yahoo.ca>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
My usual I am not an engineer and don't rely on this info discalimer applies, but I have seen some comericial towers intalled on what appear to be large free standing concrete structures that don't a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00135.html (11,263 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
I really appreciate all the feedback my post has generated. I think it will be helpful to add some further background. Under normal circumstances I would not trust a builder, but I have known this gu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00136.html (8,095 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:31:27 -0700
I'm sorry if it looks like I'm picking a scab, but ... If there were concerns about the stability of the soil underneath (sand and water), how does putting a 2 foot layer of soft material (gravel) on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00141.html (11,209 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:44:28 -0700
When my aunt and uncle installed an inground swimming pool at their house in New Orleans (below the level of Lake Ponchartrain) they basically had to build the pool in water. The water comes in so fa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00142.html (10,678 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:53:47 -0700
One could put up a guyed tower on the base. With suitable guying (and anchors), even if it settles, it will still remain mostly upright. (I'm reminded of the Monty Python scene.. "When I first came
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00145.html (8,287 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Rehman" <doug@k4ac.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 21:04:01 -0400
Reminds me of a commercial tower over near Melbourne, FL. The 400'+ tower was built on a former landfill. In the first few years, the tower sank several feet. The owner just kept tightening up the gu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00156.html (9,934 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <StevesLists1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:14:22 -0400
My gut feeling is that your 90,000lb 11' x 11' base, sitting on top of the ground, is enough to hold up your 90' tower, if the concrete doesn't break, and you don't mind the tower shifting a bit due
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00157.html (10,158 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:40:43 -0700
And what does your gut feeling tell you about the fluidity of the soil under the base since you've never seen it? That's what will determine whether his tower tips over or not. It isn't even possible
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00162.html (9,192 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 22:05:58 -0400 (EDT)
Rudy, In 1912, German company built an 820 foot radio tower not far from you on an ocean front island in Tuckerton, NJ. They also had a high water table problem and built most of their tower and guy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00164.html (12,936 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Chaggaris" <jimc@pwrone.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 21:23:15 -0500
Great stuff Frank. 73, Jim N9WW James Chaggaris President PowerOne Corp./PowerOne Environmental Corp. 1020 Cedar Avenue Suite 203 St. Charles, IL 60174 Phn: 630-443-6500 Fax: 630-443-6505 Cell: 630-6
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00165.html (13,631 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:16:24 -0700
I think David's lack of additional detail, plus focus on little stuff that doesn't matter so much, makes it sound dicier than it probably is. For instance, he says only 1.5' of the foundation is belo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00169.html (11,667 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x1@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:57:47 -0700
Kevin: You are absolutely correct on this and I have been in e-mail contact with Rudy concerning his foundation and was cc'ing the list but it seems that those didn't get through. Richards post just
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00172.html (14,036 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu