Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\'WWV\s+halfwave\s+vertical\"\,\s+was\s+Vertical\s+vs\s+Beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\'WWV\s+halfwave\s+vertical\"\,\s+was\s+Vertical\s+vs\s+Beam\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 'WWV halfwave vertical", was Vertical vs Beam (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:28:12 -0400; The WWV "halfwave" vertical is actually a quarter wave vertical with sloping, elevated radials. It can also be seen as a center fed half wave vertical dipole. No magic. I have personally used one of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00121.html (9,728 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 'WWV halfwave vertical", was Vertical vs Beam (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:45:21 -0400; Exactly my sentiments on these two points (see quote below) 1) GAP has at least one antenna which employs three 25 foot "counterpoise" wires that are not connected to either side of the coax feeder..; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00159.html (9,054 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 'WWV halfwave vertical", was Vertical vs Beam (score: 1): Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:09:46 -0400; I was given a GAP Challenger a few years ago....lady wanted it out of her yard. The 'owner' had been invited to spend 15 - 20 years in a secure facility, so she figured he would not longer need it. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00162.html (11,711 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 'WWV halfwave vertical", was Vertical vs Beam (score: 1): Author: "Bill Axelrod" <bill@axelrods.org>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:40:20 -0500; what would at the other end of the antenna spectrum from a 100 foot tower with the biggest M2 or SteppIR yagi beam on it. How much is just enough for WHAT? Good enough for WHAT? When the sunspots re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00163.html (11,061 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 'WWV halfwave vertical", was Vertical vs Beam (score: 1): Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:27:21 -0500; I suspect the Hexbeam would meet your lightweight, performance above average requirement. They claim it can go on a mast. 73, Joe kk0sd --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00189.html (10,499 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 'WWV halfwave vertical", was Vertical vs Beam (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:53:17 -0400; Interesting prospect,.. . I will research them further, but as I live in Michigan, and we get some rather serious snow and ice storms, I had previously considered this in the "quad" beam category and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00206.html (8,711 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]