- 1. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1)
- Author: sbookout@mnsinc.com (Steve Bookout)
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 20:22:30 -0500
- Hello all. A few years ago when I put up my rotating tower here at the new QTH, I put my trusty 205 Hygain at about 85 feet. This seemed like a good place because it was right above my second guy rin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00331.html (11,834 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1)
- Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole)
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 23:22:06 -0500 (EST)
- I still say that if you must be limited to one beam and one height, a TH-7 at 70 feet is the best that can be had. K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towert
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00347.html (7,943 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1)
- Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 20:39:10 -0800
- I might change that to a TH-11, but I certainly agree with your premise. 73, Dick -- Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada DM09db (South of Reno) Visit http://www.qsl.net/w7di/ -- FAQ on WWW: http:
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00348.html (8,203 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu