Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+Re\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Replacing\s+coax\s+question\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:14:26 -0700
An advantage of LMR-400 or any similarly constructed cable is that it's double shielded, and literally 100% shielded by the inner foil shield. That hasn't anything to do with "loss," but is still a b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00248.html (12,512 bytes)

2. Re: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax question (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:09:45 -0400
is that it's foil shield. Why is that important? _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00256.html (8,391 bytes)

3. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:46:58 -0700
Re: Double shielding, usually it's not important at all. However, there are applications where single shielded cables hardly work, unless the shielding is solid, like hardline. One such application i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00257.html (8,708 bytes)

4. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax question (score: 1)
Author: "Daron J. Wilson" <daron@wilson.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:54:12 -0700
I'm sure I'll take some heat on this, but oh well. First, I would consider LMR-400 to have a dual shield, not to be double shielded. It has a foil shield which likely provides 100% shield covered wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00261.html (9,797 bytes)

5. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax question (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:42:48 -0500
I'll take a stab at this question. Certain to be corrected if in error. <grin> Two reasons come to mind. 1. Since RF travels on the inside of the shield, there is less chance for some to leak out; i.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00271.html (10,335 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu