Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wy6k@YAHOO.com: 77 ]

Total 77 documents matching your query.

21. [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:51:39 -0800 (PST)
I agree that tilting these things over is real iffy. I admit that mine is overloaded. When I tilt it over, the strain is incredible and I feel it is an accident waiting to happen. So I quit doing tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00235.html (13,722 bytes)

22. [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Good point, Stan. Does anyone know how many hams die on average every year in antenna and tower related accidents? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00236.html (12,896 bytes)

23. [Towertalk] crankup towers (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:13:48 -0800 (PST)
I'm a coward that way too! I also put mine down part way when the wind kicks up. Mine is overloaded and I'm a bit jumpy about it so I never put it in the position of having to meet its specs. What lu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00243.html (8,362 bytes)

24. [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Veeelllllyyyyy interestiing observation. Hmmmmmm. Maybe I should adjust my nesting fixture so there is some tension on the cable when it's down all the way. But I can never get tension on both the pu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00244.html (10,011 bytes)

25. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:04:55 -0800 (PST)
I've had legal fights with cities, counties, and deed restrictions over antennas. I've been in court over this more than once. The method of enforcement of CC&R's is a lawsuit (at least in California
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00300.html (12,370 bytes)

26. [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:11:48 -0800 (PST)
Amen. Couldn't agree more with what gm says here. Airplanes can be operated in any number of improper ways and, when misoperated, are extremely dangerous. But that does not negate the value of airpla
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00301.html (10,701 bytes)

27. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:05:07 -0800 (PST)
Paul, Good comments. Is there anything that one could write on the CC&R's that might negate certain portions of the CC&R's. For instance, if I write just above my signature something to the effect th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00305.html (10,504 bytes)

28. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:07:05 -0800 (PST)
The farm is the preferred solution!! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00306.html (12,700 bytes)

29. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Good info, Gary. The fact that the FCC passed this law for a commercial venture and won't do so for ham radio certainly demonstrates the economic imperative that is at work in Washington these days.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00311.html (13,604 bytes)

30. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:18:14 -0800 (PST)
Yes, it might be a good question for that reflector. But I was asking one particular guy who seems knowledgable and who had just opined on this list about this topic. I did not pose it as a general q
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00313.html (9,456 bytes)

31. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Thanks, Paul. I did something like that once too. However, I bought the FIRST house in a small subdivision of 12 homes. I knew the developer was keen to get the first one sold (to get the pump primed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00314.html (13,980 bytes)

32. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:28:27 -0800 (PST)
How many people here on this list have actually been sued by a homeowner's association? Is this concern real in a legal sense but not terribly probable? Or have there been lots of such actions agains
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00315.html (14,423 bytes)

33. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:29:26 -0800 (PST)
I'm with you Jim. It seems to me that CC&R's may well be the biggest threat to the future of ham radio. At least in California, it is virtually impossibe to buy in any newish development and not be p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00344.html (15,898 bytes)

34. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 17:36:02 -0800 (PST)
I took it that he was insulting US lawyers and the morase they have dragged us into. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00347.html (9,613 bytes)

35. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:48:07 -0800 (PST)
I agree with Eddy. There's nothing that will bring down more towers than CC&Rs. And it is not all a legal issue. Part of it is practical advice and awareness raising. Once you are in the thick of a f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00436.html (10,914 bytes)

36. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Or two if they are veggie torts, right? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00437.html (10,607 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] Super high antennas on 10 to 20 (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (Michael Watts)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:03:40 -0800 (PST)
So has anyone tried using an elevation rotor on a high yagi? Why couldn't you have the best of all worlds with a high yagi and point it up for high arrival angles? Michael WY6K ______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00054.html (12,803 bytes)

38. [TowerTalk] Crank up tower climbing safety (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (Michael Watts)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:51:59 -0800 (PST)
There's a clear solution to the safety problem with crankup towers. It's the use of a "nesting" fixture on which each of the telescoping sections rests when the telescoping sections are down. I agree
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00137.html (8,496 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] Crank up tower climbing safety (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (Michael Watts)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 20:29:24 -0800 (PST)
A whole of guys have asked me for a description of the nesting fixture I use. So I'll try to describe it here. I have a TriEx LM470D motorized crankup with positive pulldown. This is one of those thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00149.html (11,501 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] Crank up tower climbing safety (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (Michael Watts)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 21:16:43 -0800 (PST)
No, John. My tower is the usual triangular tower. It's a TriEx LM470D, which is a lot like the US Tower HDX series. I don't know what to say to make the image clearer. May have to wait for pictures.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00150.html (8,741 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu