Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wd4ngb@sprynet.com: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] pipe masts (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (Bruce Richards)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:16:54 +0000
It will bend like a noodle with any thing more than a flag on it. You could get by using high carbon steel sections, but thet are not cheap............Bruce -- -- Bruce Richards / WD4NGB (No Good Bum
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00241.html (9,625 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Rotors: Yaesu vis Hy-Gain (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (Bruce Richards)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 16:13:02 +0000
Another factor to consider is the long term life of the rotor. The smaller one are not much of a problem as they are throw aways. Will cost more in shipping and repairing than they are worth . Now wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00373.html (11,426 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (Bruce Richards)
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 23:05:19 +0000
Hello Dick. I have been operating 10m for many years and have found that there is no perfect height. The only solution is stacks. At this time I am using a single 7 element monobander at 90 feet. Thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00050.html (10,873 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] www.thewireman.com (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (Bruce Richards)
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 14:47:22 +0100
The page looks fine.. Glad to see you get on the Web. I would include the URL for page into your signature file of your E mail like mine is below. This is called a hyperlink. If you have any trouble
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00680.html (8,461 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Separating Aluminum Tower Sections (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (Bruce Richards)
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 21:25:31 +0100
You may wish to try it like I did once. A guy was going to sell a tower he had 40ft laying dowm connected to a 25G hinge. He couldnt get the sections apart. I tried helping him, and with out the corr
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00739.html (8,511 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] yagi comments (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (wd4ngb@sprynet.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 14:56:38 -0700
Hello Guys, this is in referance to the long boom monobanders and if they are worth the trouble. I have a hombrew 7 element monobander on 10 meters with a 45 foot boom at 90 feet. The only thing I wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00411.html (12,315 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] KLM-34XA insulator problems ? (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (wd4ngb@sprynet.com)
Date: Sun, 4 May 1997 06:28:43 -0700
You have the information correct. The KT34XA is the "BEST" tribander ever made. To get this kind of performance , it is large and uses dual driven elements. It uses a complex system to eliminate the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00103.html (10,419 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Pro-67B (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (wd4ngb@sprynet.com)
Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 14:15:47 -0700
I have found that this is the best way to do it also as long as it is out the clear. There is one exception to this and that is a true log periodic antenna can not be done this way. -- " WHERE BIGGER
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00238.html (9,513 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Pro-67B (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (wd4ngb@sprynet.com)
Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 17:45:14 -0700
This is done also to verify that it is funtioning normal. I was stating you can not verify a log this way, even a small one. I would hate to take any antenna to the top of my tower with out doing a b
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00246.html (9,715 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Hy-Gain Quad (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (wd4ngb@sprynet.com)
Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 13:02:59 -0700
You can get E mail to Hy-Gain at hygain@telex.com Put the following in Subject line: ATTN:Customer service GL.....Bruce arms -- " WHERE BIGGER IS BETTER" \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Bruce Richards/WD4NGB (No Good
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00746.html (9,837 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Re: [DX] No-Code (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (wd4ngb@sprynet.com)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 15:55:22 -0700
I , as a Tech/Plus , concur 100% with both gentelmen. I am enjoying trying to make the Honor Roll as a Tech on 10m , but when I have accomplished "MY" goal, I will get my CW speed up and upgrade. I h
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00746.html (9,950 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Re: [DX] No-Code (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (wd4ngb@sprynet.com)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 16:04:23 -0700
I , as a Tech/Plus , concur 100% with both gentelmen. I am enjoying trying to make the Honor Roll as a Tech on 10m , but when I have accomplished "MY" goal, I will get my CW speed up and upgrade. I h
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00747.html (9,890 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] 2 towers/2beams phased (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (wd4ngb@sprynet.com)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 03:58:51 -0800
This will work very well. JH1AJT,Zorro, who has 351 total confirmed on 10m is using two towers of stacks on 10 meters. I was able to work him in the "Summer of 94" on 10 meters.There was not another
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00605.html (9,979 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu