Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com: 321 ]

Total 321 documents matching your query.

281. [TowerTalk] Sorry feedpoints (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 22:36:02 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Ron, The loop simply splits the current into two areas of half the level, the sum of which is nearly identical to driven element current in a yagi of the same patter
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00353.html (10,260 bytes)

282. [TowerTalk] Sorry feedpoints (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 22:36:02 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Ron, The loop simply splits the current into two areas of half the level, the sum of which is nearly identical to driven element current in a yagi of the same patter
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00354.html (10,288 bytes)

283. [TowerTalk] Dealing with Lightning and MCI (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 08:37:50 +0000
Excuse the stttering post yesterday. MCIONE does that if I post at busy times of the day, I have no idea why. To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Steve, Let me ask a few questions. I have a nearly 200
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00360.html (11,992 bytes)

284. [TowerTalk] Dealing with Lightning and MCI (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 23:06:33 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> That's correct Dave, and at the same time don't forget that field is a nearby infinite impedance field easily distorted by even the poorest conductors. Every day we wor
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00371.html (14,439 bytes)

285. [TowerTalk] Launching dipoles (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 09:37:46 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I use the same basic technique, with one major change. I use hollow aluminum arrows, and fill the outer half (near the point) with solder or lead. I do this by cutting
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00484.html (10,415 bytes)

286. [TowerTalk] The elusive Bencher Beam? (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 12:57:32 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> What other "loading loss" substitutes for "NO lossy traps"? Is it interlaced fllsized elements for each band, or a form of "lossless linear loading" that adds the some
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00626.html (7,488 bytes)

287. [TowerTalk] Secondary Vertical Antenna (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 14:55:11 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi John, I had to do some tests of different antennas for a manufacturer, and I bought a Butternut. It was one the best performer of the group tested. If you elevate th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00629.html (8,043 bytes)

288. [TowerTalk] K7LXC, et al Tirbander Comparison Tests--Questio (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 21:33:14 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Jim, You ask some good questions below. The questions touch on a lot of questionable conclusions published in amateur and professional text lately. I have no idea wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00655.html (13,918 bytes)

289. [TowerTalk] Testing Antennas (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 09:17:04 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Joe and all, First of all let me say that I really appreciate hands-on work and the direct approach used in the antenna tests. I'm not talking about that one specifi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00710.html (8,851 bytes)

290. [TowerTalk] Re: getting coax into shack thru wall (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 21:53:36 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> A nice low impedance path from the tower to the house won't ground anything, a nice wide surface area connection to earth will. Only with a very good ground. It's a ser
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00741.html (9,321 bytes)

291. [TowerTalk] Re: getting coax into shack thru wall (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 21:53:35 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> That's one reason why disconnecting the feedline and all other cables OUTSIDE the bulkhead is a good idea, especially if you can pull the cables back a few feet. Of cou
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00742.html (9,301 bytes)

292. [TowerTalk] Re: getting coax into shack thru wall (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 08:34:59 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Steve, You are welcome to do that at your house, but I won't do that as a "rule" at my house or at most of the commercial installations I oversee. My closest tower i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00747.html (10,320 bytes)

293. [TowerTalk] Re: Lightning ground "Holy Wars" (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 08:34:59 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi All, It's looking for that collection or source of opposing charges. In my installation, I prefer it do that out at the tower. Impedance isn't great for any groundin
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00748.html (9,081 bytes)

294. FW: [TowerTalk] Re: getting coax into shack thru wall (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 12:40:36 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> No, read what I wrote below again. If it isn't clear, I'll try to explain it better. As explained in my paragraph above. Series impedance from common mode chokes PLUS t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00758.html (11,708 bytes)

295. [TowerTalk] Tuners (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 10:14:40 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Ameritron should be releasing a new tuner soon. I designed the tuner, and sent them the prototype a few months back. It features an edge wound silver-plated roller coil
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00205.html (7,987 bytes)

296. [TowerTalk] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 10:04:43 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Ameritron should be releasing a new tuner soon. I designed the tuner, and sent them the prototype a few months back. It features an edge wound silver-plated roller coil
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00214.html (8,867 bytes)

297. [TowerTalk] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 12:06:01 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> The X-match, despite the marketing hyperbole all modern-age manufacturers engage in, is really just a conventional T network tuner. The unique feature is the network em
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00215.html (10,960 bytes)

298. [TowerTalk] Tuners (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 12:58:08 +0000
Hi Rag, The only requirement is that the RF switches have to exceed the absolute breakdown voltage of the capacitors by a reliable safety margin. That's true for all the RF switches in the tuner. Som
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00220.html (8,263 bytes)

299. [TowerTalk] Rain static and grounding (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 18:13:30 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Harvy, This might be a good time to point something important out. The coax ground with the .01 caps, incorrectly described as a "shielded ground", was published yea
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00285.html (10,444 bytes)

300. [TowerTalk] ferrite saturation and IMD (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 09:40:37 +0000
Among some suggestions and questions I sent Tony in an e-mail, I promised Tony I'd do a two tone test on some of the small 73 mix cores he used. I measured RF current through a string of four beads (
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00340.html (7,895 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu