Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ik@subich.com: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Is the FCC sharp? Is ARRL counsel swift? (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 00:31:15 -0500
Of course, one could argue that amateur radio towers is a first amendment and separation of powers issue. The federal government has authorized us to operate an amateur radio station and no other go
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00010.html (9,918 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Is the FCC sharp? Is ARRL counsel swift? (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:56:03 -0500
Not necessarily so. I know of several people who had absolutely no idea the property they were purchasing had CC&Rs until they were presented the documentation at closing. In most cases, the CC&Rs a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00062.html (9,728 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Is the FCC sharp? Is ARRL counsel swift? (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:48:11 -0500
There is a very large and powerful National Association of Home Builders ... the housing industry trade association ... and any move to weaken CC&Rs would certainly run up against them. ____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00073.html (9,472 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Half slopers using a tower (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:51:12 -0500
Yuri, You made an assumption about the configuration under discussion (as did Tom). The original poster did not specify if the unused 1/4 wave wires were grounded or floating (the switch boxes Tom de
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00124.html (10,317 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Fwd: KYTV, Channel 3 - Springfield, MO - Television tower topples] (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 01:52:03 -0500
Dick, Certainly the common failure mode of commercial towers (other than intentional sabotage) is failure of one member (either vertical or horizontal) which will result in a crumpling or crushing fa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00082.html (9,563 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Fwd: KYTV, Channel 3 - Springfield, MO - Television tower top... (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:34:51 -0500
Lest anyone doubt the weight of TV antennas, here is a fragment of e-mail from my former Assistant Chief Engineer in Huntington WV. He was updating me on the digital tower project that started some f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00135.html (10,663 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Tall (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:34:03 -0500
FCC and FAA regulations tend to limit commercial towers to 2000' The FAA will, almost as a matter of course, find any tower greater than 1000' a "hazard to air navigation" and the FCC's ERP vs. heigh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00199.html (10,283 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] 40m 4square - factors relating to gain (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:31:39 -0500
Tom, Since I'm planning an antenna installation I did some modeling of a Cushcraft D-40 (half a 402CD) at 60 feet over poor ground (Diel Const = 10, Cond = 2 ... sandy Florida soil) vs a four square
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00287.html (9,094 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Is it worth it to move 2El Quad from 50ft to 100ft????? (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:45:42 -0400
Since the original question concerned a move from 50 to 100 feet, in my experience a single 10 Meter antenna at 100 feet is almost always too high to do much good. With a single (multi-band) antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00335.html (10,397 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] vertical antennas (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:40:20 -0400
Guy, You missed a key piece of information ... The FCC standard is 120 *HALF WAVE* radials for AM broadcast. 1) it maintains the .02 wavelength separation at the ends ("dense" radial field) 2) it pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00491.html (9,722 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Will-Burt dropping Tri-Com amateur tower line (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:27:31 -0400
Don't take "leaving the amateur market" too literally. I spent some time talking with my contacts at Will-Burt on Monday (my business is a large user of their pneumatic mast product). WillBurt are si
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00675.html (9,309 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Feeding tower for 160m may QST 1975 (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:48:28 -0400
I can vouch for the problem with Netscape 4.7. I keep a copy on my systems for two reasons ... to access the FCC ULS and to check HTML (web source code) before releasing it on some of the sites I hel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00063.html (9,794 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] How high should my Tower be for 10-20 Meters? (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:26:13 -0400
Nathaniel, Many years ago when I was in Columbus my studies indicated one wanted to be around 50 to 55 feet for reasonable minimum performance on 20 meters (I don't believe one gets enough bang for t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00511.html (9,662 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Lightnng protection (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 21:41:41 -0400
Try http://www.radio-ware.com/books/bppglep.htm List Sponsor: Champion Radio Products - We'll be at the Dayton Hamvention with all of our safety equipment and other products. Stop by booth #559 and s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00397.html (8,992 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] "Danger: RF Radiation" Sign? (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:54:26 -0500
Check the "NAB Store" www.nab.org and the Society of Broadcast Engineers www.sbe.org. Both have generally had similar signs for use around broadcast facilities. The signs are not exactly inexpensive,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00243.html (10,530 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:47:13 -0500
How true ... I vividly remember a phone conversation with a tower vendor (and regular advertiser on TowerTalk) in which I asked for 100 MPH specs on his towers (both extended and retracted). He comp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00384.html (9,535 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:38:32 -0500
When major portions of the country is in other than 70 MPH wind zones, it would make sense to do at least sample calculations for 80 and 100 MPH (or 110 MPH) wind zones. Manufacturers of guyed and f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00392.html (10,505 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Article info needed (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:57:50 -0500
QST ... November 2000 page 62 (Hints & Kinks) -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00457.html (7,889 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] Tri-Ex (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:55:17 -0500
I have dealt with Will-Burt Manufacturing for nearly 20 years in the broadcast business. They build nearly all of the pneumatic (microwave) masts used in live broadcast vehicles, emergency light "to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00517.html (8,834 bytes)

20. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] Tri-Ex (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:03:38 -0500
Knowing the people, process and product at Will-Burt, I know they will produce a quality product as long as there is a market and it is profitable for them to do so. The real question is whether Fir
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00530.html (9,241 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu