Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7vp@comcast.net: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Action against US Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:19:09 -0700
You are only partly right, Bill. The issue was not negligence. That issue had been taken out of the mix with the advent of Manufacturers Strict Liability in Tort beginning with the Yuba Power case in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00179.html (16,069 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: [SteppIR] 3El height (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 08:04:49 -0700
Nice response Jim. One comment regarding the statement that "The composite wave strength may be greater or less than that from the driven element alone. . ." This may be true in the sense that the fi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00846.html (14,283 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Classic Feed Model TAC-33K (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:06:49 -0700
Well it is not a T-match, Pete. A T-match does not have a split driven element and th ends are indeed attached tot he driven element. Doesn't sound like a Beta match either since there is no direct c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00441.html (10,382 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Classic Feed Model TAC-33K (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:47:57 -0700
Bill It is a very clever arangement which is consistent with my last post. I think I would prefer to use a 1:1 balun for the feedpoint, however, rather than what is essentialy a common mode filter ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00453.html (12,809 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated Vertical with No Radials on Metal Roof (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:43:58 -0700
Bob You do not give the dimensions of your roof. I will say, however, that my experience with the metal roof was very good. I had a 40x50 metal shop in Ellensburg that I mounted a pair of verticals o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00559.html (12,266 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Masts (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 04:13:15 -0700
Allen There are two primary issues to consider between steel and aluminum. They are torsional rigidity and yield strength. Since aluminum has about 1/3 the Young's modulus of steel it will require a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00648.html (11,841 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:35:26 -0700
Frankly Pete I have found these comments neither "useless" not "crap." Yours, on the other hand . . . 73 Bill W7VP -- Original Message -- From: <HFDXJUNKIE@aol.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00739.html (8,302 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards - ENUF! (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:12:41 -0700
Since August 9 I have received 375 posts on this forum. I stopped counting when I got past 100 that arguably did not relate to the theme of this reflector. Use of inflammatory language with respect t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00781.html (9,171 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] And now for something completely different(TrueNorth) (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:57:15 -0700
Jim This is still measuring it with a micrometer, marking it with a piece of chalk and cutting it with an ax. 73 Bill W7VP You've already paid for it... http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/topocentric.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00649.html (12,656 bytes)

30. [TowerTalk] Not OFF TOPIC - Jist no response (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:35:44 -0700
This is my third try at getting info on the Create RC3-5 conbtroller. Mine is not working properly. I hope there is someone out there who can direct me to a schematic and instructions for the thing.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00291.html (6,832 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] Another Thank You Note (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:25:12 -0700
My warmnest thanks to those who sent me information on the Create RC5-3 rotator controller especially those who emailed the instruction manual and the contact infomration for Create in Japan. As sugg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00439.html (7,652 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Spring between equalizer plate and earth anchor (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:44:53 -0700
There is actually more to it than that Jim. Whenever there is a combination of a spring, a mass and a dampening source there is the prospect of dynamic oscillation. In so cases the potential oscillat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00503.html (11,070 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] Guying a self-supporter (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:35:48 -0800
Thanks for your insight Steve. Now if you would please provide us with a similar analysis in the buckling modes. It may take a bit more math (differential equations?) but the thought experiments ough
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00118.html (8,236 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Guying a self-supporter (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:46:09 -0800
The following was Steve's question to me and my response which was snet off the reflector. Steve said:"Bill, Are you an engineer? If so, can you devise a case, using a reasonable tower and guy system
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00152.html (10,691 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Guying a self-supporter (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:50:30 -0800
Steve First I did not claim to be an expert. Quite the contrary. I am only one who has doubts on the basis of my experiences. At one time many years ago I had a free standing Universal tower made fro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00156.html (10,069 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Guying a self-supporter (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:09:39 -0800
Hi Roger Let me summarize the loads on the tower. Remember that in the equilibrium condition the sum of the forces and the sum of the moments have to equal zero. 1. Compressive load from the weight o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00175.html (18,505 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Guying a self-supporter (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:32:52 -0800
Hi Steve Your way is much better of course if you can run the double guys. The only benefit of running the single guy to a "Y" is that the resulting force vector associated with the twisting moment i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00178.html (11,905 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] guying self supporting towers (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 12:05:30 -0800
Jim If you are referring to the Rohn TA45 then that is exactly what I have done using angle sections only I have placed the torque triangle at the location of the rotor since that is where the twisti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00205.html (9,687 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Guying a self-supporter (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:34:57 -0800
Hi Bud: "With horizontal guy wires, high winds add no downward force on the tower legs; the only downward force at *any* time is dead weight of the tower and the antenna (which you already have in yo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00238.html (17,368 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu