Mail Archive Search: <+from:w7ni@easystreet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w7ni@easystreet.com: 174 ]

Total 174 documents matching your query.

21. [Towertalk] How Not to Break a Wrist! (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:34:59 -0800; This is one of those inherent dangers in towers with cranks. You are not the first one nor will you be the last. It just one of many subtle "gotchas" on crankups and Hazers. I will never own one . .; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00849.html (9,075 bytes)
22. [Towertalk] Trylon Towers (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:56:53 -0700; Hi Byron, If you REALLY want to help us avoid this pitfall, you will tell us the name of the dealer to avoid . . . Stan w7ni@easystreet.com I a rated miles tower http://www.mscomputer.com additional; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00229.html (9,688 bytes)
23. [Towertalk] Guy Anchor Question (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:51:24 -0700; Hi Jon, My question would be, "What is the rating of these anchors when set in concrete?" It may STILL be 2500 pounds, depending on the failure mode. Is it only 2500 pounds because they pull out of t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00230.html (10,849 bytes)
24. [Towertalk] JOE REISERT -- Undeliverable Mail (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:52:06 -0700; Well, Joe, sometimes when servers do things we don't like, we get a new server. It is painful . . . I know . . . I have done it . . . but we certainly are not, as you put it "powerless to fix it . .; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00231.html (11,576 bytes)
25. [Towertalk] I THINK its 25G (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:29:09 -0700; There are at least TWO other significant differences between 20G and 25G. The guage of the leg tubing is 18 guage for 20G and 16 guage for 25G. Also, the OD of the solid Z bracing is 9/32" for 20G an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00337.html (8,318 bytes)
26. [Towertalk] More on tree antenna mounts (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:55:28 -0700; I see an interesting directional indicating problem with the beam attached under the rotator. When you push the control for the rotator to rotate "clockwise", the normal part of the rotator that turn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00351.html (10,530 bytes)
27. [Towertalk] screw in anchors (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:16:17 -0700; Well, in theory at least, it would take 1900 pounds to LIFT it, but how much to drag it horizontally across the ground? Much less, I suspect . . . Stan w7ni@easystreet.com the that http://www.mscompu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00422.html (9,594 bytes)
28. [Towertalk] yagis in trees, indicator backward (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:55:15 -0700; Hi Rich, I think you need to think this one through again. Looking at this from the top, if you hold the base of the rotator in one spot, like on a normal tower installation, and ask the rotator to r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00423.html (10,088 bytes)
29. [Towertalk] screw in anchors (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:20:16 -0700; Well, yes, but it is risky and I have never done it, personally. You can never really predict which trees will blow down in the next wind and here in the Pacific NW, MANY trees blow down every year .; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00424.html (12,314 bytes)
30. [Towertalk] e-mail address (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:38:13 -0700; www.custommetalworks.com or paulnyl@teleport.com or paul@custommetalworks.com Stan w7ni@easystreet.com -- Original Message -- From: <Dshmkat@aol.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00563.html (7,392 bytes)
31. [Towertalk] Rohn 25 Guy Bracket/Torque Arm Question (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:37:14 -0700; It is my understanding that Rohn had torque arms in their product line way back in the late 50's when I first became aware or Rohn. Later, in the 80's I think, they discontinued them because they did; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00630.html (10,772 bytes)
32. [Towertalk] Rohn 25 Guy Bracket/Torque Arm Question (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:43:49 -0700; Interesting. However, not really relevent. I too, have some fairly recent Rohn catalogs and they DO NOT show TB25D Torque Arms anywhere. Are you sure you are looking at Rohn Part Number TB25D? The pr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00786.html (10,722 bytes)
33. [Towertalk] Rohn Torque Arms (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:45:15 -0700; Well, I see there is some confusion about the official Rohn part numbers for the stuff we are talking about. TA25 = Channel Torque Arm Assembly. This is the big triangle piece that goes around the to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00787.html (8,439 bytes)
34. [Towertalk] Guy Attachments (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:17:31 -0700; This is the trouble with "drawings" instead of actual photographs. They leave out details that are actually there. No where on this page do I see ANY reference to TB25D Torque Arms . . . Stan w7ni@ea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00788.html (7,213 bytes)
35. [Towertalk] Cracked Leg on Rohn 45G (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:20:07 -0700; I think you need to dig out the tower base and redo it . . . at least plant a new base next to the old one and transfer the tower to it. The problem is that any repair you do to the old base does not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00965.html (9,727 bytes)
36. Re: [Towertalk] Tower Buidling 201 (score: 1): Author: "Stan & Patricia Griffiths" <w7ni@easystreet.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 10:27:07 -0700; Hi Joe, Here are a couple of suggestions that might help you: Install the house bracket before you pour the base concrete. This way, you can move the tower base slightly to get it perfectly vertical,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00984.html (11,616 bytes)
37. [Towertalk] Rohn 25G Questions (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:57:20 -0700; Hi Guys, jimb@nauticom.net and the idea I asked this same question of Rohn some time ago and got a similar answer from them. Essentially they said 25G was designed so long ago that nobody around ther; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00273.html (10,093 bytes)
38. [Towertalk] Tower Buidling 201 (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 10:27:07 -0700; Hi Joe, Here are a couple of suggestions that might help you: Install the house bracket before you pour the base concrete. This way, you can move the tower base slightly to get it perfectly vertical,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00806.html (10,542 bytes)
39. [Towertalk] Tower considerations when using side arms (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:40:10 -0700; Stan w7ni@easystreet.com http://www.mscomputer.com additional 5 percent off; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00254.html (8,984 bytes)
40. [Towertalk] mast (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:51:42 -0700; Another thing to consider is using a block and tackle with lots of rope to reduce the load on the gin pole and make it easier for the ground crew to hoist that heavy mast. If you are using a Rohn gin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00279.html (9,835 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]