Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve7avv@shaw.ca: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Half-Square or ?? For 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Paul B. Peters, VE7AVV" <ve7avv@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:06:29 -0700
I just had my tree climber back to the acreage and now have two new antenna supports at 110 feet. The two trees are 130 feet apart. Given the lay of the land, the new supports are on a north - south
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00801.html (7,829 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Re: Half-Square or ?? For 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Paul B. Peters, VE7AVV" <ve7avv@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:20:00 -0700
One detail I omitted in my recent post was the fact that I want this new antenna specifically for 75m/80m (resonant at 3.795). I already have two dipoles for this band and a requirement of this new a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00803.html (8,432 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Half-Square formula? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul B. Peters, VE7AVV" <ve7avv@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 16:41:40 -0800
Over the past couple of weeks I have been researching the half-square antenna. While a combination of magazine articles and Internet-based information produces a significant amount of data and experi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00160.html (8,883 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu