Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mymts.net: 211 ]

Total 211 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: G5RV vs 40M dipole (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:05:57 -0500
And, since energy can be neither created nor destroyed, all the energy that goes into destroying poorly chosen chokes or radiated down the feedline is energy that is NOT being radiated by the antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00649.html (11,149 bytes)

82. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator Lightning Protection (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 16:39:44 -0500
I guess the moral is, if you think disconnection is a guarantee, you're wrong. Unless you can anticipate every path and diligently disconnect everything every time. Of course, you can't ignore the po
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00188.html (24,221 bytes)

83. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: G5RV vs 40M dipole (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 07:32:34 -0500
It's not just the ones marked 100w that are cheaply made. And you can always do better yourself for less money than the good ones. 73, Kelly ve4xt Sent from my iPhone ________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00257.html (15,240 bytes)

84. Re: [TowerTalk] 90 degree coax bend atop a crankup tower (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 06:32:01 -0500
Wouldn't holding the coax with a sling-type grip in such a way that the bend itself is a tension-free loop, solve both problems? The issue in both cases is the unsupported weight of the coax pulling
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-06/msg00058.html (12,375 bytes)

85. Re: [TowerTalk] JK Navassa antenna (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:41:49 -0500
i would disagree: the dBi numbers seem in line with other trapless 2-el designs, such as the C3 or XR3. Theyd be way high if they were quoted as dBd numbers, but take off the, what, 2.4 dB, to get to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-06/msg00261.html (9,721 bytes)

86. Re: [TowerTalk] JK Navassa antenna (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 21:36:07 -0500
I believe the tribander used at WRTC was a touch different than the Navassa5. I think WRTC stocked up when Cycle 24 was still supplying the TX 38, or when DX Engineering was supplying it. The JK Trib
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-06/msg00270.html (14,440 bytes)

87. [TowerTalk] MFJ Moxons (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:36:23 -0500
Hi All, Is this true? A chap is advertising a 15-Meter Moxon on QTH.com <http://qth.com/>. Now, I dont want the antenna, dont like the antenna and dont need anyone to tell me not to buy it. Because I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00031.html (7,265 bytes)

88. Re: [TowerTalk] Base stubs for old AX-series tower (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:21:29 -0500
Don't blow a section if you can't find stubs. Find a local steel supplier and have him cut you some channel iron. He can probably also drill holes for the bolts. Have him drill a third hole towards t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00061.html (9,132 bytes)

89. Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ226 / SARK110 (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:32:49 -0500
Hi Pete, The Steppir site is a bit confusing, but if you click on the "order yours now" and not the pic and not '...or click here' you do get to a typical Steppir order page. IIRC, $389. 73, kelly ve
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00114.html (11,402 bytes)

90. Re: [TowerTalk] guy posts math (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:57:02 -0500
Im pretty sure the 20-foot utility poles in many neighborhoods are not 80 feet long. (Three feet down for every one foot up would be 60 feet buried and 20 feet in the air.) I could see 20/3 (6.66 fee
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00185.html (13,708 bytes)

91. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Concrete Pad for U.S. Tower TX-472 (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 15:09:52 -0500
I hope to pour in August, but I too have water. If it's only a few inches, is it worth worrying about? 73, Kelly ve4xt Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ ____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00270.html (11,610 bytes)

92. Re: [TowerTalk] Slobering Irons (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:56:56 -0500
Sounds as though the real beauty of the Metcal for PL259 work is that touching the tip to the shell sinks off enough heat the tip falls below its Curie point, which means the tip continues to generat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00316.html (13,168 bytes)

93. [TowerTalk] Antennas in trees (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 18:03:28 -0500
Anyone have any advice for getting the fishing line to come back to ground zero? I have no problem getting the line over a nice, tall branch but the arrow and tennis ball get caught up on the way bac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00012.html (6,751 bytes)

94. Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas in trees (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 13:45:12 -0500
Thanks to all who replied. I used an amalgam of replies and hit pay dirt on the first try: teardrop lead weight, fired by a slingshot that had been a tennis ball-based launcher that, frankly, sucked.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00050.html (16,988 bytes)

95. Re: [TowerTalk] Static Discharge Porcupines? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 13:07:28 -0500
I think porcupines fall into that category of 'if you tell a lie frequently enough, eventually you believe it, too.' Which might explain a lot of the opposition to Ufer grounds... 73, Kelly, ve4xt Se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00181.html (13,539 bytes)

96. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft R8 Guying? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:48:01 -0500
Hi Deni, I have an MA8040V, which probably isn't as top-heavy as the R8, and I'd heartily recommend guying. There's a lot of movement otherwise, and that fibreglass tube at the base gets chewed throu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00248.html (8,609 bytes)

97. Re: [TowerTalk] T2X rotor for DB-36? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:44:57 -0500
Trees or not, I think Id be leery of using a T2X for a DB-36. The DB-36 is not a small nor light antenna, 160 pounds and a 26-foot turning radius equates to 4,160 foot-pounds on the rotator, about 1,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00511.html (9,012 bytes)

98. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 20:16:01 -0500
I get the complaint regarding schematics. Even Ameritron gives you a schematic. That said, I've never called and asked for one. Maybe on request??? That aside, DX Engineering has been superb on servi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-09/msg00107.html (11,339 bytes)

99. Re: [TowerTalk] Anyone using spiderbeam for 40m? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 10:38:32 -0500
Based on a design I found online, and reverse-engineering for some omitted dimensions, it appears you would need the corners of the hex to be 21 feet out from the mast. Since they gain strength from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-09/msg00158.html (9,391 bytes)

100. Re: [TowerTalk] Omnidirectional antenna for domestic contests. Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 154, Issue 18 (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:31:53 -0500
No arguing with results, however, I would point out that your 400 mile radius will mean quite a different QSO count in a high-density amateur region such as W1 than in other areas. A 400-mile radius
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-10/msg00103.html (15,813 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu