Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mymts.net: 211 ]

Total 211 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TowerTalk] Digging for tower base (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:29:05 -0500
Moreover, even if you log in, it's a closed group. 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk maili
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00261.html (9,660 bytes)

142. Re: [TowerTalk] Lead-Shot Counterweight (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 18:28:38 -0500
Hi Jim, Do you weatherproof your split-bolt or u-clamp connections? 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00426.html (11,549 bytes)

143. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 07:19:05 -0500
It can often be easy to forget that ultimately, the only arbiter of law that counts is the Supreme Court. Jim's right: it's not clear at all what Part 97.313 really means. It provides no standard for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00427.html (19,631 bytes)

144. Re: [TowerTalk] Legal Power measurement Discussion (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:38:34 -0500
Further to Jim's point, Even if you accept that you must measure at the output connector of your amp, the rules certainly do not mandate an accepted norm of station construction. Just because most pe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00461.html (12,169 bytes)

145. Re: [TowerTalk] F to UHF adapters (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 12:16:53 -0500
Hi Tony, I'd suggest you're best off going with Plan B. While I'm not a connector conspiracy theorist saying every adapter is evil, if you don't need an adapter, what's the upside of using one? 73, k
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-10/msg00017.html (9,245 bytes)

146. Re: [TowerTalk] Voltage at ends of yogi parasitic elements? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:10:30 -0500
Johns old idea seems like the perfect application of something in QST a while back: a pneumatic relay. A puff of air up a non-conducting piece of tubing would trigger the switch: I cant recall if it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-10/msg00251.html (11,498 bytes)

147. Re: [TowerTalk] Voltage at ends of yogi parasitic elements? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:24:09 -0500
I should add that it doesnt change needing a robust switching mechanism to handle the voltage, but at least resolves the issue of conductors to switch a relay being in the vicinity of the antenna. 73
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-10/msg00252.html (11,842 bytes)

148. Re: [TowerTalk] Cad Welding tips (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:13:30 -0500
For Cadwelding, I'd recommend also to secure the wires from movement, as the force generated by the combustion can shoot loose wires free, leaving you with a useless blob of weld material and no conn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00031.html (19,428 bytes)

149. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Dipole Questions (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:15:04 -0600
Setting aside the question of whether an OCF is a good design (I'll let K9YC take that question), it's important to note that even if you could get a good pattern off it (owing to feedline radiation)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00135.html (11,668 bytes)

150. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Dipole (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:13:49 -0600
. Funny that you'd think those who don't like the OCF design would instead be touting "commercial stuff with funny matching devices and impressive names." Home-made dipole, home-made choke. Fan dipol
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00172.html (8,975 bytes)

151. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1)
Author: Taylor Kelly <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 22:16:18 -0600
Heres the URL for the pdf Bob attempted to share: http://www.n6bt.com/NEW-FLYER-2016-apr-rev-3a.pdf <http://www.n6bt.com/NEW-FLYER-2016-apr-rev-3a.pdf> 73, kelly, ve4xt, _____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00339.html (10,422 bytes)

152. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 going away (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:05:48 -0600
I dont think anyone has said Mosleys dont work, merely there are others that work better. Anything will radiate, its just by degrees how well. The data does favour other antennas and disfavour Mosley
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00503.html (10,211 bytes)

153. Re: [TowerTalk] Advice on tower restrictions possible new install (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 12:42:04 -0600
Unless you plan on being a champion of antenna rights, if youre flexible, wouldnt it be best to find a spot with the most ham-friendly policies? Land of the free, home of the HOA 73, kelly, ve4xt, __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00201.html (14,566 bytes)

154. Re: [TowerTalk] Attractive nuisance (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:32:42 -0600
Surely theres a threshold for anti-climb measures beyond which the kid is on his own. For example, no anti-climb measures, youre on the hook. What amount of anti-climb measures is enough? What level
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00202.html (10,757 bytes)

155. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:40:42 -0600
I've been trying to divine a defence for this box, but can't. If I read K9YC's choke cookbook correctly, there's no way this could achieve the level of broadband choking claimed. Moreover, not only i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00356.html (10,548 bytes)

156. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:41:07 -0600
Hi Wes, Yes, the enclosure is mandated by the choice of coax. Doesnt mean you have to choose that coax, however, does it? If you can see $900 of value in it, then by all means, buy one. I see, maybe,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00378.html (12,279 bytes)

157. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:55:53 -0600
Interesting that on this reflector, and in the shoddy "journalism" by the quoted magazine, nobody has attempted to contact the ARRL or get the other side of the story. Then again, balanced reporting
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00533.html (13,258 bytes)

158. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:38:22 -0600
One thing you learn after almost 30 years in publishing is, let he who is without sin The uninitiated would be blown away by how easy it is for major gaffes to slip through even the most professional
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00553.html (9,842 bytes)

159. Re: [TowerTalk] Replacement wench for tilt fixture (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:59:58 -0500
Still the BEST typo in the tower business! 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00441.html (8,432 bytes)

160. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter beam (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:42:22 -0500
Heres a thought: if one can use a fan dipole to make an inverted vee cover both 80 and 75, how about a fan reflector? 73, kelly, ve4xt _______________________________________________ ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00459.html (11,365 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu