Mail Archive Search: <+from:ve2dc@rac.ca>

Results:

References: [ +from:ve2dc@rac.ca: 59 ]

Total 59 documents matching your query.

21. [Towertalk] K6STI (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin (VE2DC)); Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:53:22 -0400; Anybody know how to get in touch with him... his e-mail, which worked last year, now bounces. (K6STI@ns2.net) I've never encountered someone selling software who is so awkward to get in touch with...; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00694.html (6,527 bytes)
22. [Towertalk] RE: K6STI (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin (VE2DC)); Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:50:06 -0400; Well it's not working now... the nS2 below was a typo... I tried k6sti@n2.net Thanks... Anybody know how to get YO? Anybody know how to get in touch with him... his e-mail, which worked last year, no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00696.html (6,885 bytes)
23. [Towertalk] K6STI (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin (VE2DC)); Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:34:45 -0400; That's what I did try... the "S" was an unfortunate typo. Thanks Mel, Try k6sti@n2.net. No "S" after n. GL Howard..K2HK --Original Message Follows-- From: "Mel Martin \(VE2DC\)" <ve2dc@rac.ca> Reply-; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00697.html (7,892 bytes)
24. [Towertalk] 95' limit fair? (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 07:47:39 -0400; Surely you don't expect to build a major contest station in a residential subdivision? This is as unreasonable as a 35' limit. 95' is higher than the vast majority of amateur installations. Most comp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00028.html (7,149 bytes)
25. [Towertalk] Log Periodics (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 14:10:23 -0400; I notice in Jim's post that he had 4 antennas within 20 ft... probably at 5' intervals with the 40M antenna at the top. I've used the 105/155/205 and would expect that antennas this close would not b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00071.html (7,074 bytes)
26. [Towertalk] Six Pack (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 07:51:54 -0400; The mere fact that 6 people have had problems with intermittant relay contacts has me wondering whether my new remote switch at 150' really should be a six-pack. It's a long way to climb to tap it wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00295.html (7,054 bytes)
27. [Towertalk] 'Toes' of a tower concrete base (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 06:55:55 -0400; Sorry Dave... but when you are putting up structures than can kill someone... it should be done in a "professional" way... which doesn't necessarily mean hiring someone... but you DON'T put up a str; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00514.html (8,711 bytes)
28. [Towertalk] 'Toes' of a tower concrete base (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 13:21:57 -0400; Actually it's more than a yard... it's the principal of following the manufacturers instructions or not, and it's also a question of the proper way of pouring tower foundations... using forms and bac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00522.html (9,358 bytes)
29. WINPROXY didn't stop KLEZ! was Re: [Towertalk] Klez (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 11:45:07 -0400; Not a good idea Carl... it ends up cluttering all reflectors. There are newsgroups/reflectors for those who want research viruses. I don't mind the occasional "heads up" though... mel... VE2DC; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00190.html (6,706 bytes)
30. [Towertalk] Lightning (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 06:36:02 -0400; I don't agree with this at all... I've taken a number of direct hits with minimal damage... You cannot protect 100%, lightning is somewhat unpredictable, but you can mitigate the odds considerably. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00381.html (7,061 bytes)
31. [Towertalk] re: Lightning (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 12:19:59 -0400; I do this too Pete, but it won't be enough if the tower isn't properly grounded, and steps haven't been taken to decouple the lines running into the house and ground them at the point of entry. But; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00395.html (6,542 bytes)
32. [Towertalk] Dayton declining... (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:42:02 -0400; Right on Mike... there'll no point putting up antennas if there's no one to talk to... BTW... I was going to go at the last minute... but decided I wouldn't be able to find accommodations... should h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00563.html (7,594 bytes)
33. [Towertalk] Models (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 16:40:09 -0400; Finally bought some modeling software... EZNEC... and considering YO and AO... Does anyone have models developed for any of these: Hygain TH11, DB12/17 Optibeam antennas, or any other interlaced desi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00501.html (6,975 bytes)
34. [Towertalk] Models (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 07:24:56 -0400; I have one tower.... 150'... another one would be hard to clear with the zoning board (wife) That's why I want to "look before I leap" (model) Thanks Tom...; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00517.html (8,951 bytes)
35. [Towertalk] Models (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 07:30:54 -0400; He's still around... Brian Beezley <k6sti@n2.net> YO 7.5 now available...; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00518.html (8,517 bytes)
36. [Towertalk] Bad faith... (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:02:21 -0400; If a vendor extends the courtesy and trust of accepting a personal cheque??? I'll share a true story from the Ham vendor's point of view. I had someone stop a personal cheque because he "thought" th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01084.html (6,854 bytes)
37. [Towertalk] F12 40M antenna near 10-20M antennas (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:05:34 -0400; Looking for opinions on this setup. Force 12 claims that their 2 and 3 el 40M beams (240M 340M) can be mounted within 7' of their C31. I modeled the Cal-Av 40M, and various 2el and 3el 40M beams with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01119.html (8,082 bytes)
38. [TowerTalk] Anybody try the F12 XR49 or XR51 (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 06:45:44 -0400; Well no-one replied who was using the C49... too new I guess... But a lot of info and food for thought recieved... thanks all. What I REALLY need is another tower ;-) List Sponsor: Are you thinking a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00036.html (7,930 bytes)
39. [TowerTalk] Yuri's antennas (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 08:11:13 -0500; I visited Yuri once when I was visiting Toronto... He demonstrated the 15 Razor he had up at the time. He also had a TH6 up at a comparable height... I think it was actually a little higher. Conditio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00268.html (7,898 bytes)
40. [TowerTalk] 40M beam at modest height (score: 1): Author: Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 07:41:48 -0500; I have to agree... I had a 2 el 40m at 75' and it was a great antenna... wish I had it up now... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00474.html (6,957 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]