Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tod@k0to.us: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [TowerTalk] BPL interference (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:27:48 -0600
Maybe Ralph Nader or one of the other candidates has taken a position. Tod, K&Oslash;TO _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "W
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00808.html (9,286 bytes)

22. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 22, Issue 110 (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 09:27:25 -0700
I couldn't agree with you more. In fact, I would encourage folks to vote 'for' the candidate of their choice and not against anyone or any 'thing'. It may be that the guy you select is flawed, but t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00814.html (7,255 bytes)

23. RE: [TowerTalk] KT34XA Torque Balance (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - Minnesota" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:05:02 -0600
Mike: I have been through the same consideration -- with a KT34XA in Minnesota and a TH7DXX in Idaho. I do not have an absolute solution, however I will share with you what I plan to do in Idaho this
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00182.html (12,948 bytes)

24. RE: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - Minnesota" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:36:22 -0600
John's post a few back mentions the articles I was trying to cite but could not remember since the paper copies are in Idaho. I suspect that those who wish can find a source of these excellent papers
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00242.html (8,631 bytes)

25. RE: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - Minnesota" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:05:01 -0600
John wrote, " ... and the add When I read John's outline of the force analysis it joggled my memory. In April of 2002 I had read the three papers John mentions. I discussed them with Lyle, K0LR, and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00252.html (10,041 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] Wind torque balancing (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - Minnesota" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:54:28 -0600
A few days ago I said that I would load some pictures showing the wind effect on a beam which had a single element at one end of the boom and where the boom was mounted so that the mast (pivot) went
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00372.html (9,095 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] RE: Product Improvement - Wind torque balancing (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - Minnesota" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:15:46 -0600
Let me start by telling a true story. A very long time ago I was taking a college math class which had an instructor who was more focused on proving that those of us in the class were intellectually
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00400.html (11,515 bytes)

28. RE: [TowerTalk] MFJ-1025/1026 (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:05:31 -0600
Quite a while back, when this reflector was discussing subjects somewhat close to antennas, towers and receiving HF signals, Bob wrote the following, I happen to have an MFJ-1026 and happen to have r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00982.html (9,376 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:57:08 -0600
As one of those who started using Sideband in 1955 I want to assure you that the complainers did more than just talk about SSB guys. For a long time SSB guys on 75 meters were only allowed to operat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00543.html (9,594 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: 16:1 Transformer (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:43:55 -0600
The Sevick books have elaborate, complex arithmetic equations [imaginary number plane] which allow one to calculate what might happen to the reactive part of the impedance. Tod, K&Oslash;TO _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00240.html (8,991 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] omega demolition video (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:19:17 -0500
This clip seems to demonstrate that when towers come down they don't fall into your neighbor's yard. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supportin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00859.html (7,313 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] omega demolition video (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:49:06 -0500
You guys are so serious I am afraid to submit any comments on your comments. Clearly it was a carefully planned and controlled demolition. I never thought anyone would take my comment even slightly o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00883.html (10,458 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Lubricating air variable capacitors (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 18:23:13 -0500
Jim: As I understand it WD-40 is very similar to a light weight diesel fuel. I am sure it is a petroleum based product. I would have expected it to have some lubricating properties . Could you or som
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00024.html (8,090 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] WD40 - additional (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:17:11 -0500
I have been impressed by the number and variability of the responses to my query about WD-40 as a lubricant. This morning, in Idaho Falls, ID, I had an opportunity to speak with one of the DOE scient
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00078.html (12,683 bytes)

35. RE: [TowerTalk] WD-4&Oslash; Finale (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 22:20:32 -0500
Mark did not mention it, but in Section XII (Ingredients/Identity Information) three components are listed. See URL below. 1. Stoddard Solvent ( >50%) 2. Petroleum Base Oil (>15%) 3. LPG [Liquefied P
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00100.html (9,027 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Anniversary (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:50:02 -0700
The official definition of "old" is: Anyone who is ten years older than your current age. The definition of 'young punks' is anyone who is then years younger than your current age. As the saying goes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00307.html (13,277 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Anniversary (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:29:46 -0700
I know this thread is way off topic but until Steve catches us: Tom's response reminds me of a cartoon that was in the Minnesota Daily when I was an undergraduate there. In the cartoon you have an ob
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00311.html (9,131 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Understanding Antenna Impedance Measurements (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:38:28 -0700
Jim (and Jim) Those values look like they are within about 2% of expected values for the R and within 20% or so on the X. Is the analyzer accuracy any better than that if there is NO coax between the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00512.html (9,514 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Understanding Antenna Impedance Measurements (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:56:16 -0700
In the end it is transferring power to the antenna that counts. Unless the VSWR is awfully high and/or the line length is very long I think it is quite stuffiest to put a tuning network at the statio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00517.html (11,540 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] Choke Balun measurements (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:01:39 -0700
I made some measurements that were to be used to design BN86 replacement units. I looked at some type 30 material that many folks across the US acquired recently in a "Big Buy" and compared it with t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00832.html (7,356 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu