Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:robert.west@eatmoresoap.com: 57 ]

Total 57 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] [ct-user] CT on Vista - any hope of doing this quickly? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:08:09 -0400
Back in the day, as we say, most of the early DOS programs were written with speed and space in mind. For this, they would write directly to the hardware allowing quicker response to the display and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00054.html (9,754 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] [ct-user] CT on Vista - any hope of doing this quickly? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:13:54 -0400
True, we do. But in our defense I would say that it is in our basic nature and our sense of community when it comes to a plea for answers to help when we can. I don't have the topic front and center
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00062.html (11,375 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] weatherproof plastic enclosures (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:47:39 -0400
I've been using the very same boxes from Home Depot. The 12x12x6 versions are 40 bucks around here and are darn tough. Bob They look like PVC junction boxes to me. The onese I have are made by Carlon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00170.html (8,486 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] weatherproof plastic enclosures (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:17:39 -0400
What about a UV rating for those? Have you used any of them in sunlight for an extended period of time? There's and even MORE cost effective solution... available at WALMART, etc... Consider using th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00222.html (10,555 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] weatherproof plastic enclosures (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:38:28 -0400
I'm with ya! I'd rather plunk down 40 bucks for a decent NEMA rated outdoor box than save 30 bucks today only to have to pay 200 tomorrow. Short term thinking leads to long term expense. Bob Tupperwa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00239.html (16,352 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] weatherproof plastic enclosures (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:06:27 -0400
I use similar boxes and swear by them. The first time I used the plastic NEMA rated boxes I checked them after the first couple of good rains and was satisfied. Whenever I crack them open the equipme
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00241.html (17,109 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:22:17 -0400
I've installed many wireless IP cams inside but never outside although I've seen it done cheap enough. Most of the exterior IP cams I've seen are pretty expensive and have the pan, tilt and zoom (PTZ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00247.html (10,338 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] inductance of tubing vs bar or strip (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:10:31 -0400
I used copper pipe because strap wasn't available cheaply here. I knew not to solder it, solder melting temp too low anyhow, so I brazed it. Seems to do the trick just fine. B0b I thought he might be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00344.html (11,829 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] ride up with the load (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:55:12 -0500
It's lucky more didn't also ride DOWN with the load! Holy cow! No wonder OSHA is so strict. And $250 is a SWEET deal for a crane to do anything. of us survived. ______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00172.html (7,789 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Isolated Mode Antenna Technology (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:06:48 -0500
You aren't the only one. I'm still scratching my head trying to figure out if this is just a load of horse "stuff". Bob Is it just my ignorance, or does this "description" make no sense?I read it mor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00206.html (10,289 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Neverseize on rohn tower legs (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:11:33 -0500
Anthony, The reason that Rohn says not to use the neverseize is because when you bolt the sections together, it crimps the sections together. The design relies on friction between the two parts to ad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00097.html (9,775 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Neverseize on rohn tower legs (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:52:46 -0500
A lesson a few of us learned the hard way. Me included. :) Bob it, Great suggestion, Bob! I remember one day watching one of my boards "floating" down to the ground thanks to my trying to maneuver th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00098.html (8,870 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:54:44 -0500
Temps. I use long ropes. You can usually tell when you are too high, it will sway some. A good sign you need a guy! Bob Assembly question: Does everyone work above the guywires to stack higher sectio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00106.html (7,792 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:57:49 -0500
I agree. Taking a tower down requires the same attention to safety but I, along with others I've worked with, will treat it differently. And sometimes as a speed contest. Not good. Man, you rode a 40
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00107.html (10,048 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Neverseize on rohn tower legs (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:08:29 -0500
Sounds like a job for the torch! I disagree Bob. I was given a Rohn 25 40' and had to dismatel it. The top section was so stuck that I had to use a couple of 2x4 pieces across the steps and my car si
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00118.html (12,880 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] neverseize on tower legs (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:51:05 -0500
I've been having a hard time buying a Tower Jack, myself. The guy who makes them, his site is up but no one answers the phone or returns emails. The other sites that carry them tell me they don't hav
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00135.html (8,498 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] neverseize on tower legs - TwoerJack (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:28:43 -0500
Must have been out of stock when I called you guys a few months ago. I talked to someone there who told me to call the guy with the dead website. I think I found one though from a HAM so it may be al
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00145.html (8,256 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] mailing list etiquette (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:52:27 -0500
Marlon, I totally agree especially to the "Reply To All" being a pain in the butt. I forget half the time and only reply to the poster thus the rest of the list doesn't see any replies. The threads t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00197.html (10,895 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] mailing list etiquette (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:54:38 -0500
Because it was constructive criticism, not personal at all. Having input from the users should be welcomed, not repulsed like some attack. There is no need to dismiss suggestions, no matter how crazy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00209.html (15,476 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] mailing list etiquette (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:18:12 -0500
Discussion about the list should be allowed on the list, in my opinion. There is no other forum available that I know of. Bob --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00210.html (13,746 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu