Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pbc.law@outlook.com: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] STEPPir ANTENNAs (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 18:04:46 +0000
This QST article from 1994 was co-authored by N6BV with K1VR and may be of interest. The file can be downloaded from my Google Drive in the link below: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S0hKxkov9RZx5
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-04/msg00048.html (8,793 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:36:07 +0000
It may be worthwhile to consider installing a pair (or multiples) of vacuum relays on the open line, outside the house, to function as a DPST knife switch. Relay closure is controlled inside the ham
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00022.html (10,808 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:39:05 +0000
P.S. A photo of the first RS8 relay pair can be seen in the upper-left corner of my outside ATU. https://www.qrz.com/db/W9AC#BALANCED%20TRANSMATCH Paul, W9AC It may be worthwhile to consider installi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00023.html (11,489 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:28:29 +0000
I indicated that a suppressor could still be used with vacuum relays -- to your point, if required to satisfy a code provision. Nothing should prevent the use of vacuum relays together with a UL sup
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00027.html (9,650 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Listed Antenna Discharge Units (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 20:16:08 +0000
Right. You're then in the same league as the major industrial players who supply whole-facility surge protection devices and need ample indemnity protection when either the device fails to protect o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00036.html (7,736 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 02:20:07 +0000
Performance of the W7FG dipole (aka Dipole-Doublet and CF Zepp) is relative, as shown by Cebik in the PDF attachment. The radiation pattern will be more complex and less predictable than on resonant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00051.html (10,379 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 02:27:58 +0000
The PDF file is also linked from my Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SauvrwkWudTpODWjsXW84PU_-4W9Fqhf/view?usp=sharing Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00052.html (8,807 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:09:26 +0000
All antennas are mechanical and often break at the worst time. At least if an ATU fails, it's at ground level and conveniently fixed. Coaxial-fed dipole antenna center insulators often break and coa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00057.html (13,791 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 16:09:20 +0000
Like this one: https://tune-a-tenna.com/ Advantage: allows a 1/2 wave azimuth pattern on all bands or even variable patterns if desired by adjusting antenna element length.  It also solves the probl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00064.html (10,225 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 20:11:35 +0000
I have a graveyard of 7-8 prop pitch rotators, all awaiting rebuilds one day. In each case, failure resulted from water ingress, not mechanical stress. As an experiment, a new method was tried: a sil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00074.html (12,672 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 23:59:37 +0000
https://www.mcmaster.com/products/silicone/rubber-1~/high-temperature-silicone-rubber-sheets-bars-and-strips-6/ Item # 1460N34 Pricy, but not as pricy as a $2,500 prop pitch rebuild. Being silicone-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00077.html (8,930 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:06:47 +0000
P.S. The sheet overlap is held together with Dow Corning 736 heat-resistant RTV sealant. Paul, W9AC https://www.mcmaster.com/products/silicone/rubber-1~/high-temperature-silicone-rubber-sheets-bars-a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00078.html (9,273 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Good vacation antenna (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 21:21:42 +0000
Recall that Kirchoff's Law was used by some antenna experts to challenge W9UCW's result. In particular, the main concern was that placement of the RF ammeters inside the coil ends perturbed the measu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-07/msg00037.html (13,157 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Good vacation antenna (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 21:48:21 +0000
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10j9nm0co_0Qn4usGmbnr1JSJFn5-W9SQ/view?usp=sharing Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-07/msg00038.html (10,582 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu