Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pbc.law@outlook.com: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] STEPPir ANTENNAs (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 18:04:46 +0000
This QST article from 1994 was co-authored by N6BV with K1VR and may be of interest. The file can be downloaded from my Google Drive in the link below: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S0hKxkov9RZx5
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-04/msg00048.html (8,793 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:36:07 +0000
It may be worthwhile to consider installing a pair (or multiples) of vacuum relays on the open line, outside the house, to function as a DPST knife switch. Relay closure is controlled inside the ham
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00022.html (10,808 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:39:05 +0000
P.S. A photo of the first RS8 relay pair can be seen in the upper-left corner of my outside ATU. https://www.qrz.com/db/W9AC#BALANCED%20TRANSMATCH Paul, W9AC It may be worthwhile to consider installi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00023.html (11,489 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:28:29 +0000
I indicated that a suppressor could still be used with vacuum relays -- to your point, if required to satisfy a code provision. Nothing should prevent the use of vacuum relays together with a UL sup
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00027.html (9,650 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Listed Antenna Discharge Units (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 20:16:08 +0000
Right. You're then in the same league as the major industrial players who supply whole-facility surge protection devices and need ample indemnity protection when either the device fails to protect o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00036.html (7,736 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 02:20:07 +0000
Performance of the W7FG dipole (aka Dipole-Doublet and CF Zepp) is relative, as shown by Cebik in the PDF attachment. The radiation pattern will be more complex and less predictable than on resonant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00051.html (10,379 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 02:27:58 +0000
The PDF file is also linked from my Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SauvrwkWudTpODWjsXW84PU_-4W9Fqhf/view?usp=sharing Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00052.html (8,807 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:09:26 +0000
All antennas are mechanical and often break at the worst time. At least if an ATU fails, it's at ground level and conveniently fixed. Coaxial-fed dipole antenna center insulators often break and coa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00057.html (13,791 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] UL listed protector for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 16:09:20 +0000
Like this one: https://tune-a-tenna.com/ Advantage: allows a 1/2 wave azimuth pattern on all bands or even variable patterns if desired by adjusting antenna element length.  It also solves the probl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00064.html (10,225 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 20:11:35 +0000
I have a graveyard of 7-8 prop pitch rotators, all awaiting rebuilds one day. In each case, failure resulted from water ingress, not mechanical stress. As an experiment, a new method was tried: a sil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00074.html (12,672 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 23:59:37 +0000
https://www.mcmaster.com/products/silicone/rubber-1~/high-temperature-silicone-rubber-sheets-bars-and-strips-6/ Item # 1460N34 Pricy, but not as pricy as a $2,500 prop pitch rebuild. Being silicone-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00077.html (8,930 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <pbc.law@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:06:47 +0000
P.S. The sheet overlap is held together with Dow Corning 736 heat-resistant RTV sealant. Paul, W9AC https://www.mcmaster.com/products/silicone/rubber-1~/high-temperature-silicone-rubber-sheets-bars-a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-06/msg00078.html (9,273 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu